By John Q. Hosedrinker 
On Thursday, the TSA launched an investigation into how a passenger was able to bring a meat cleaver through security at Portland International Airport and onto a Delta Air Lines flight. The cleaver, discovered after the passenger boarded the plane to Salt Lake City, prompted Delta staff to report the incident, leading to passenger deplaning and rescreening. The TSA is working to determine the cause of the security breach and will take corrective measures, including potential workforce training, while Delta apologized for the subsequent delays. The flight ultimately arrived in Salt Lake City with a two-and-a-half-hour delay.
Read the original article here
TSA investigating how a meat cleaver made it onto a plane in Portland – well, that’s certainly a headline that grabs your attention. It’s the kind of story that immediately sparks a wave of comments, and you can practically hear the collective eye-roll across the internet. It seems like a regular day at the office for some, while others are rightfully flabbergasted.
The consistent theme that emerges is a sense of disbelief in the TSA’s effectiveness. It’s almost comical how many people have stories of near misses – pocket knives, steak knives, even a loaded handgun, apparently making it past security checks. One person’s experience of having a bag thoroughly inspected for trail mix and books while a meat cleaver apparently slipped through the cracks perfectly illustrates the inconsistency that many people feel. And that story about the woman who carried expensive chef knives in her carry-on, simply because she didn’t want to risk checking them? It adds to the surreal feeling.
The sheer variety of prohibited items that people have either accidentally or intentionally taken on planes is astounding. It makes you wonder how the system can be so porous. Razor blades, pocket tools, even shotgun shells – the list goes on. The consensus appears to be that the TSA’s focus often seems misdirected. While some individuals have reported intense scrutiny of seemingly innocuous items like batteries or bottles of liquid, potentially dangerous objects are sometimes overlooked.
The phrase “security theater” appears again and again, and it rings true for a lot of people. It suggests that the primary purpose isn’t necessarily to ensure safety, but rather to give the illusion of it. The idea is that the TSA is playing the part, going through the motions to create an environment where everyone *feels* secure, even if the actual security measures aren’t foolproof.
There’s a sense that the current situation is also a result of a combination of factors, which leads to such discrepancies. A major factor is the belief that TSA employees are overworked and underpaid. It’s an entry-level position that many people see as a stepping stone to something better. Additionally, as one person said, it’s not always the best and brightest who apply for the job.
Then there is the issue of how the TSA operates. It seems plausible that if you were to pack a blade parallel to the scanner, it might appear as only a thin line, making it easy to miss. And the fact that TSA contracts often go to the lowest bidder might mean that the quality of equipment or the training of personnel could be lacking.
There is also some suggestion that the priorities seem askew. The experience of having a bottle of medicated lotion confiscated while a dangerous weapon is allowed through security really hammers this point home. And there’s the whole idea that a meat cleaver gets a pass, but they’re sure to pull you out of line because you forgot a Red Bull. It feels as though there needs to be a fundamental rethinking of how the system prioritizes threats and implements security measures.
The incident in Portland raises some serious questions about the TSA’s effectiveness. Are the screening protocols adequate? Are the staff properly trained and motivated? And ultimately, is the current approach really providing the level of security that travelers deserve and expect?
One thing is certain: This meat cleaver incident is a clear demonstration of a system that is not working as efficiently as it could. It’s time for a serious reassessment of TSA procedures to ensure that they are actually achieving their primary objective: keeping everyone safe while traveling.