By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump announced plans to initiate land strikes in Venezuela “very soon,” expanding the ongoing military operations that currently include attacks on boats suspected of drug trafficking in international waters. This expansion of military action comes after weeks of attacks on boats in the Caribbean Sea and Eastern Pacific, and amid a U.S. military buildup near Venezuela, including the deployment of significant naval and troop presence. While escalating military pressure, Trump also signaled openness to potential diplomatic engagement with Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. This decision follows the designation of the Cartel de los Soles as a foreign terrorist organization.
Read the original article here
Donald Trump say military ‘soon’ will strike land targets in Venezuela, and honestly, the immediate reaction is a mix of disbelief and a chilling sense of déjà vu. It’s a statement that immediately brings up questions about the man’s past promises, his motivations, and the legality of such an action. Didn’t he campaign on not starting new wars? Now, it seems like we might be headed down that very path. It’s almost as if he’s forgotten his own words, or perhaps, the allure of power and distraction has simply outweighed them.
This potential military action, if it materializes, feels less like a strategic move and more like a carefully orchestrated performance. The idea of bombing land targets, the potential for human casualties, all feels secondary to the political theater. It’s as though the goal is to create a spectacle, to appear strong and decisive, even if the actual outcome is a mess. It’s about feeding the MAGA base, playing the tough guy for the cameras, and conveniently shifting the narrative away from his own legal troubles.
The cynical pragmatism of the situation is hard to ignore. The timing, the location, and the potential justifications all seem convenient, or rather, calculated. Venezuela, an oil-rich nation, is ripe for the taking, or at least, that’s how it might look from a certain perspective. It’s a classic case of using military action as a means of control and diversion. It’s all about control – control of the narrative, control of the country, and potentially, control of vital resources.
For many, this scenario isn’t just a political problem; it’s a terrifying prospect. The thought of a new war, of American troops being involved in another foreign conflict, is deeply unsettling. It’s a costly endeavor, not just financially, but in terms of human lives and global stability. It’s a stark reminder of the devastating impact of war, and the sacrifices that will be made.
And then there’s the question of legality. Shouldn’t Congress have a say? Shouldn’t there be proper debate and approval before military action is taken? It’s a fundamental principle of democracy that seems to be getting conveniently forgotten. It’s a power grab, plain and simple, and it comes across as profoundly undemocratic.
The potential for disaster, both domestically and internationally, is huge. It could escalate tensions with other countries, destabilize the region, and even lead to a wider conflict. It’s not just about Venezuela; it’s about the bigger picture.
Some people feel that this has happened before and will happen again. When the political situation goes sideways for the President, he will likely pull a card from his deck to get the attention off him.
Of course, the whole thing feels like a distraction. It’s easy to see how a war, any war, could serve as a convenient smokescreen, drawing attention away from scandals and controversies. It’s a classic political tactic, and it’s particularly disturbing when the stakes are so high. All this makes it even more worrying, as it might become a way to avoid consequences, to delay justice.
There’s the disturbing aspect of this potentially being about a desperate attempt to cling to power. In the face of legal challenges and political headwinds, starting a war could be seen as a way to rally support, to declare a state of emergency, and to postpone accountability. It’s a dangerous game, one that could have far-reaching consequences for democracy itself.
It’s all so unnecessary. Why Venezuela? There are plenty of pressing issues at home and abroad that deserve attention and resources. The focus should be on building a better world, not starting a new war.