By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Sources say the White House is urging Ukraine to accept its peace proposal by Thanksgiving. This ultimatum comes as U.S. support for Ukraine is reportedly contingent on their agreement. The details of the peace proposal have not been specified, but it represents a potential shift in the U.S. approach to the ongoing war with Russia.
Read the original article here
US pressuring Zelensky to back a deal by Thanksgiving or face a loss of support – that’s the headline, and it’s a stark one. It paints a picture of intense pressure, with the US potentially pulling the rug out from under Ukraine’s feet right as winter closes in and the war grinds on. This whole situation feels… wrong. Especially when we consider how forcefully the US has acted towards other nations. It feels like a double standard, almost a betrayal, when the same unwavering support isn’t being offered to Ukraine.
The core of the issue appears to be a deal that Zelensky is being urged to accept. But what exactly is being asked of him? That’s the million-dollar question. And why the urgency? Thanksgiving is the deadline, it seems. Is this really about securing peace, or is something else at play? The underlying suspicion is that this so-called deal favors Russia, essentially forcing Ukraine to concede territory and thus enabling Putin’s objectives. And if that’s the case, it’s not a deal at all, but rather a surrender demanded by America.
The very idea that the US would consider abandoning Ukraine, especially at such a critical juncture, is appalling. It raises serious questions about the US’s commitment to its allies and its stance on territorial integrity. It’s like a form of blackmail, threatening to withdraw critical support unless Ukraine agrees to terms that could compromise its very existence. The fact that the threat is presented with such a tight deadline – just before a major holiday – adds an extra layer of insult.
The implications of this potential shift in US policy are staggering. It could embolden Russia, destabilize the region, and send a chilling message to other nations relying on US support. It would be a monumental betrayal, and one that would be remembered for decades to come, becoming a new low in the history books.
The focus shifts to the former US President and his potential role. There is an undercurrent of suspicion and accusations that he’s being unduly influenced by Putin and that this whole situation is a result of a personal relationship that is not in the interest of the free world. The possibility of compromising information, like the Epstein files, being leveraged against him is also a possibility. The underlying implication is that the deal is in Trump’s personal interest, not the interest of either the US or Ukraine.
It’s being argued that this isn’t a new phenomenon. It’s the same pattern we’ve seen before: pressure from Russia, followed by US pressure on Ukraine to make concessions. In the end, the deal falls apart because Zelensky refuses to give up his country. If this pattern holds true, it’s a bleak indicator of the future.
The American stance appears hypocritical and self-serving. It’s perceived as an abandonment of principles and a betrayal of the US’s allies. The fact that the US is potentially threatening to cut off its support for Ukraine is seen as a sign of weakness, not strength. What kind of ally threatens the very support they have provided for years?
There is skepticism that this threat is even credible. Many Republicans disagree with this policy, and it’s seen as a cynical attempt to appease Putin. Many believe the US defense industry will fight back, making it impossible for Trump to stop weapons sales.
This situation is nothing short of a crisis. It underscores the fragility of international relations, the dangers of political self-interest, and the importance of unwavering support for those defending their sovereignty. The countdown to Thanksgiving has started, and the world is watching, waiting to see if the US will stand by Ukraine or leave it out in the cold.