By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump is poised to announce a healthcare cost framework, potentially halting Affordable Care Act premium increases, with a formal announcement expected at the White House alongside Dr. Mehmet Oz. The proposed “Healthcare Price Cuts Act” aims to end “surprise premium hikes” and eliminate “zero-premium” subsidies, introducing a deposit program to incentivize lower-premium options. This initiative emerges as ACA subsidies are set to expire, creating pressure for action, and aligns with bipartisan interest in addressing healthcare costs. The proposal also includes a separate bill calling for a “Most Favored Nation” drug-pricing policy.
Read the original article here
President Trump says he wants to end “surprise premium hikes” from Obamacare. Well, here we go again, right? It feels like we’ve heard this song and dance before. The immediate reaction is one of, shall we say, a healthy dose of skepticism. The premise itself, the idea of “surprise premium hikes,” feels a bit disingenuous. Let’s be honest, many of us saw this coming a mile away, especially considering the actions taken regarding the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The whole thing seems like a classic move: create a problem, then act like you’re the hero for “fixing” it. It’s like the political version of a “Mar-a-Lago Two-Step.”
The rhetoric is strong, of course. Promises of ending these supposed surprises, of providing better, more affordable healthcare. But it’s hard not to remember past pronouncements of the “best healthcare plan in the world,” and the repeated failures to deliver. Many of us are signed up for plans and experiencing the consequences of choices made during his administration. We’re talking about premiums that are exorbitant, plans that offer minimal coverage, and still demand significant out-of-pocket expenses for even basic care. It’s a system that feels designed to bleed people dry, not to provide actual healthcare.
Then there’s the core issue, which feels ignored: the glaring lack of affordable healthcare in the United States. Many of us see this in the plans we are forced to pick from, a collection of options that are often far from ideal. They leave patients paying a lot for treatments, procedures, testing, doctor visits, and medications, and often don’t provide things like dental, vision, and virtual care. It’s hard to overlook the fact that the government was shut down for weeks over healthcare. And with open enrollment already underway, there’s a strong feeling that this is just another political ploy. Any spike in premiums? Well, a lot of people will be blaming the former president and his party.
The critiques also brings up the essential question: is this really a surprise, or a predictable outcome? Many see it as a direct consequence of actions taken to undermine the ACA, including the ending of subsidies and the individual mandate. It’s a move that appears to be calculated to create the problem and then claim to have the solution. This disconnect between words and actions is a recurring theme. The fact that Trump’s party controlled all branches of the government at one point is also relevant here. The issue, which is a common complaint from many, is, “so, why didn’t you actually fix it then?”
The whole situation also highlights a deeper problem: a lack of empathy and a lack of understanding. Some critics say that it is shocking how callous some people are about this, and do not understand the consequences of healthcare costs, or how easily things can change. There’s a concern that Americans with good jobs and benefits don’t realize that they could lose those things, and their kids and grandchildren might be left vulnerable. The article notes that many people, small business owners, and contractors pay taxes and that the ACA is helping them stay employed.
The crux of the matter is that the response to the situation isn’t about solving the problem. It feels more like a game of blame and political maneuvering. The end goal? The person in charge wants credit for a perceived victory. And, as we’ve seen, those solutions are often temporary fixes that don’t address the underlying issues. The result, many say, is a continual cycle of the same problems with the same promises.