By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Donald Trump’s political resurgence was fueled by his perceived victimhood, including promises to release the “Epstein files” if elected. Despite a history of scandal and unpopularity, Trump initially maintained unwavering support, even in the face of incriminating evidence. However, there are signs that Trump’s ability to deflect scandal is waning, as anger surrounding his ties to Jeffrey Epstein persists and his support may be softening. The article suggests this shift is occurring despite his supporters’ previous tolerance of obvious falsehoods and damaging associations.
Read the original article here
The desperate calculation behind Trump’s backdown over the Epstein files revolves around a few key factors, all pointing to a carefully orchestrated attempt to maintain control and avoid any damaging fallout. Initially, the expectation was a defiant stance, perhaps claiming an active investigation to justify withholding the files, much like the prolonged “audit” excuse often used for his tax returns. But the shift in strategy suggests a more nuanced, desperate situation.
One of the primary drivers is the potential for losing control over the narrative. Publicly digging in his heels and opposing the release, especially if facing overwhelming Republican support for transparency, would be a major blow, signaling weakness and a loss of influence over his own party. In Trump’s world, where perception is often reality, such a display of vulnerability is unacceptable. He thrives on projecting strength and control, and this threatened to undermine that carefully constructed image.
The fear of a cascade effect also appears to be a significant factor. Defying Trump and winning on the issue could embolden others within the Republican party to break ranks, diminishing his ability to control them. History has shown that there is safety in numbers, and if more and more people defect, it could become increasingly hard for him to govern and retain the iron grip he desires.
Then there is the possibility that he’s playing multiple levels of the game. First, the acknowledgment that the House is out of his control. This realization may have prompted him to claim ownership of the idea, portraying it as his own initiative to ensure that the process doesn’t appear to be done to his detriment. Furthermore, there’s the likelihood that any harmful information will be redacted or altered, making any released information effectively harmless.
In a carefully crafted strategy, some individuals might be sacrificed to appease the public. Simultaneously, the real culprits might be protected, which plays right into the hands of the usual pattern. All of this can be achieved by positioning the announcement as one driven by concerns for transparency and the importance of the investigation. The “active investigation” would become the perfect cover, allowing him to control the release’s timing, scope, and content.
Of course, the whole premise of this backdown also seems to hinge on the belief that a majority of his supporters won’t scrutinize anything he does, particularly if Fox News will not mention anything negative about him. The files will be used to distract. The release, if it happens, will be met with claims of political motives and targeted investigations, which would ensure any real damage to the Trump persona is kept to a minimum.
Perhaps the most likely scenario involves a carefully orchestrated release in “increments,” with the initial focus on Democrats involved with Epstein. This approach would allow for the continuous claim of an ongoing investigation, effectively preventing the release of anything that might incriminate Trump or other Republicans. The situation is a mess, and the goal is to make it appear as though the Trump camp is in control.
It appears the move to back down on his stance of not releasing the files is a calculated effort to maintain his power, control the narrative, and deflect potential damage. It’s a move born out of fear of looking weak and the desperate need to retain control over the Republican party. The specifics may remain to be seen, but the intent is clear: to survive the storm with minimal damage to his reputation and political influence.