By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a surprising turn of events, former President Donald Trump endorsed Andrew Cuomo, an independent candidate, for New York City mayor on the eve of the election, with Tesla CEO Elon Musk issuing a similar endorsement. Trump urged voters to support Cuomo over Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani, suggesting that a vote for Republican Curtis Sliwa would effectively support Mamdani. Cuomo, a Democrat running as an independent after losing the primary, is viewed by Trump and Musk as a preferable alternative to Mamdani. Mamdani’s campaign responded, suggesting that Trump and Musk view Cuomo as someone they can control.
Read the original article here
Trump tells NYC “you must vote” for Cuomo over Mamdani on the eve of the mayoral election, and honestly, the reaction is pretty predictable, bordering on hilarious. Considering how unpopular Trump is in New York City, this endorsement is essentially a political kiss of death. It’s like he handed Mamdani a massive gift, wrapped in a bright red bow, and tied with a ribbon of irony.
This move is widely seen as a major boost for Mamdani. It’s hard to imagine a scenario where Trump’s endorsement would sway many New Yorkers to Cuomo’s side. The prevailing sentiment is that New Yorkers are not exactly fond of Trump and what he represents. So, when he tells them to vote for someone, the opposite is almost guaranteed to happen. It’s a testament to how far out of touch he is with the city he once called home.
The general consensus is that Trump’s endorsement is going to backfire spectacularly. It’s viewed as a desperate attempt by someone who’s likely feeling threatened by Mamdani’s progressive platform. It’s clear to many that Trump sees Mamdani as a threat to the status quo, and this endorsement is a direct consequence of that perceived threat. This situation also highlights the perception that Cuomo is, at best, deeply flawed, and at worst, possibly corrupt.
The idea that Trump would endorse Cuomo is seen as confirmation of something more sinister, as both men are embroiled in scandals of a similar nature. This endorsement solidifies the perception that both figures are members of the same club, and that their shared flaws are more important than any political disagreements. It’s seen as proof that the establishment will always back their own, even if those people are demonstrably unfit for office.
This situation has also sparked conversations regarding the political landscape of New York. The endorsement feels like a turning point, as it underscores how out of touch Trump is with the city. It also underscores how willing some people are to vote for someone just to spite Trump. The endorsement is interpreted as an indication that Mamdani’s message resonates with the voters, otherwise Trump wouldn’t bother, and shows how Populist Leftist politics has a solid chance of beating MAGA in NYC.
The reactions are filled with humor and incredulity. The people are mocking the situation. The majority of the people think this is a desperate attempt to interfere in the election. There is no better way to guarantee a Mamdani win than for Trump to endorse Cuomo. The entire situation is viewed with a heavy dose of irony.
The timing of Trump’s endorsement, on the eve of the election, is also being noted as too late. The early voting period had already passed. If Trump’s intention was to influence the election, this move was poorly executed, or potentially irrelevant. It seems like a strategic blunder. This timing just further reinforces the perception of Trump as an out-of-touch figure.
The underlying theme is the perceived corruption and moral failings of both Trump and Cuomo. The endorsement is seen as a meeting of like minds, a signal that these men are cut from the same cloth. The emphasis on the candidates’ perceived faults and the distrust towards both of them is very strong.
The overall sentiment is clear: Trump’s endorsement of Cuomo is a disaster for Cuomo’s campaign, and a massive win for Mamdani. The city is ready for a change, and Trump’s interference only serves to galvanize the voters to go the other way. The entire episode is viewed with a mixture of amusement and contempt. It’s a classic case of a political miscalculation that will likely go down in history as a major blunder.