By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a recent Truth Social post, former President Donald Trump claimed to have the highest poll numbers of his “political career,” though the data suggests otherwise. Multiple polls from November show Trump’s approval ratings at their lowest point during his second term, with significant negative ratings in various surveys. Trump’s claims were met with mockery by late-night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel, who highlighted the former president’s low approval ratings during his show’s opening monologue. Trump’s economic approval, particularly regarding inflation, also remains low, despite his assertions that prices are decreasing, which are contradicted by rising grocery costs.
Read the original article here
Trump, 79, Posts Early Morning Meltdown Over Approval Ratings – The president said he had received his “best numbers ever” after a week when he had his worst. That’s the core of it, isn’t it? The spectacle of a man, at a ripe 79, publicly grappling with his own perception of reality versus the actual, sometimes harsh, reality. It’s almost theatrical, this dance of denial and self-aggrandizement. The core issue is the disconnect between what’s reported – likely very unflattering approval ratings – and the message he’s choosing to broadcast.
The “meltdown,” as some might call it, is a complex mix of factors. It seems like the narrative being spun is that he’s claiming the “best numbers ever” despite a week of particularly negative developments. This immediately raises questions about the sources he’s relying on for information. Is he being fed carefully curated data, designed to shield him from anything remotely unpleasant? Is he simply choosing to believe whatever flatters him most? Or is it something more insidious – a deliberate attempt to manipulate his followers, to keep them locked into a carefully constructed fantasy?
The observations in the comments hit the nail on the head. Narcissism is a common diagnosis, and it seems to fit the pattern here. The comments also suggest a focus on his narcissistic tendencies and how they manifest in his interactions with the world. The constant need for validation, the inability to accept criticism, and the relentless pursuit of an idealized self-image all point to the internal monologue where he always comes out on top. This is the world where the reality-distortion field kicks in, where he can turn a bad score into a triumph.
It’s interesting how people are connecting the dots between Trump’s behavior and the nature of the information he consumes. He’s not reading detailed reports. He’s being spoon-fed a version of reality crafted to reinforce his existing beliefs. Those around him are likely acutely aware of his sensitivities and cater to them accordingly. This creates a feedback loop, reinforcing the disconnect between his perception of the world and the actual events.
The comparison to the story in *1984* isn’t out of place either. The book speaks of controlled information and the manipulation of truth. It’s a reminder of how easily people can be led to reject what they see and hear in favor of what they’re told. It is a frightening scenario.
The situation is worsened by some people suggesting a mental decline. While that’s something best left to professionals to assess, the comments point out obvious traits in the man. A pattern of escalating rhetoric and increasingly outlandish claims does seem to be developing. The question then becomes, what are the implications of a leader detached from reality, or at least operating in a highly distorted version of it?
The responses in the comments are also interesting. Some are sarcastic, others are critical. Some are making jokes about golf scores and toilet habits. There’s a clear recognition of the emperor-has-no-clothes situation. But there is also worry and a sense of growing unease. What happens when the gap between perception and reality becomes too wide, or when those in his orbit can no longer keep up the charade?
The political implications of all of this are massive. The comments mention the idea of getting away with crimes due to holding a position of power, and this is another example of a significant concern. There’s a sense that, regardless of the truth, he might believe what he wants to believe. It also brings the idea that he might think this behavior is a winning strategy.
Overall, it’s a window into the mind of someone who, regardless of age, seems unwilling or unable to confront the truth. The episode is a potent reminder of the dangers of unchecked ego, the importance of honest information, and the fragility of reality in the face of relentless self-deception.