By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump’s golf outings during his presidency have cost taxpayers significantly more than previous administrations. During his first term, Trump spent over $300 million on golfing trips, nearly double the amount spent by previous presidents. Trips to his private clubs, including multiple visits to Bedminster, New Jersey, and Aberdeen, Scotland, accounted for a substantial portion of these costs. Security measures, such as patrol boats and Coast Guard presence, along with the use of Air Force One, further escalated the expenses associated with these excursions.
Read the original article here
Donald Trump’s pronouncements on the Reflecting Pool, it seems, have thrown a fresh wave of shock and anger into the mix. This is, of course, on top of the already simmering resentment over his other, seemingly random, renovation desires. It’s hard to ignore the implications when someone so casually suggests altering a landmark steeped in history, a place where pivotal moments like Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech took place. It feels like a direct assault on the very fabric of American identity and a disregard for its historical roots.
The question of “why” is also on everyone’s mind. What exactly is the rationale behind this? Trump’s cryptic social media post, with its veiled jabs at the current administration, offers little in the way of clarity. One can only speculate, but the tone suggests a destructive impulse, a desire to reshape the landscape to suit his personal brand of grandeur. The comments on the post point towards everything from a desperate attempt to erase Biden’s presence, to plans for an ostentatious personal monument, and even, more disturbing, a venue for activities that many deem inappropriate.
The reported plans, or lack thereof, are also concerning. If the goal is truly to “fix” something, why the secrecy? And why the apparent haste to dismantle without any clear alternative in mind? The story surrounding the White House’s East Wing is a pertinent example of this, where demolition seemed to take precedence over planning, raising the specter of a leader more focused on symbolic destruction than any tangible benefit or forward momentum. The implications of this are significant. How does a President have the unbridled power to make such decisions regarding the nation’s landmarks without even the courtesy of congressional approval or public input?
Then there’s the broader context. This comes on the heels of other controversial initiatives, including the battles over Confederate statues. There’s a clear disconnect between respecting historical artifacts and disregarding them. It’s the same people who protested the removal of confederate statues, now potentially willing to desecrate an American landmark. The hypocrisy, or perhaps the lack of self-awareness, is staggering.
The potential cost, both financial and cultural, is substantial. This seems to be another instance of resources being funneled into vanity projects while vital needs are neglected. It’s frustrating to see historical structures and resources targeted when there are pressing issues that need attention. The public sentiment seems to be very much against this and calls to stop this destruction, this is, after all, the property of the American people, not any single individual.
The Reflecting Pool, as a symbol of remembrance and unity, seems to be a casualty of the current administration. It is where Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his famous speech. It’s a place where Americans of all races have gathered, and to alter it would be a slap in the face. It feels personal. Perhaps the sight of the Bidens at the Reflecting Pool on inauguration night was just too much for Trump to bear. The speculation is rampant, and it speaks volumes about the perception of his motivations.
The situation is a clear call to action. The focus, seemingly, is now not on governing but on shaping the physical landscape to reflect a certain personal image and erasing any trace of those he deems his opponents. It’s a moment for the public to reassert its role as the ultimate steward of American history and heritage. It’s time to stand up and say “no.”