By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Layoffs in the U.S. surged in October to the highest level in 22 years, with over 153,000 job reductions reported, as companies increasingly adopt AI and tighten budgets. This brings the total layoffs this year to 1.1 million, rivaling those seen during the global financial crisis and the pandemic. Despite President Trump’s assertions about the economy, the report highlights a shift in the labor market. The decline in job security and increased job cuts are politically sensitive and come as voters express their economic concerns, as shown by Democratic victories in recent elections.
Read the original article here
Trump Hit With Jaw-Dropping 20-Year Record Number of Layoffs. It’s tough to hear, and it seems like a lot of people are genuinely worried about what’s happening. The main takeaway here is pretty stark: layoffs in the U.S. have surged to levels not seen in two decades, specifically, the worst monthly level in 22 years. This is serious, with numbers that are typically associated with recessions.
It’s particularly striking because, at the same time, there was a narrative being pushed about how strong the economy was, how it was “never hotter.” The data, from a respected source, indicates a sharp increase in job cuts. October saw over 153,000 layoffs, making it the worst October for job reductions since 2003. And the year-to-date numbers are even more concerning – over 1.1 million layoffs announced so far this year. This puts the current layoff levels on par with what we saw during the global financial crisis.
Remember, this all comes against the backdrop of claims about economic prosperity. This creates a disconnect that many people are feeling. There’s a real sense of unease, particularly when you hear about job losses in your own circle, like family members or former coworkers, which, as a result, makes people buckle down.
The reasons for the layoffs are complex. While some point to industries correcting after the hiring boom of the pandemic, factors like AI adoption, shifts in consumer and corporate spending, and rising costs are also driving the trend. It’s a challenging situation, especially because those laid off are finding it harder to find new jobs quickly, which could further weaken the labor market.
The political implications of these numbers are significant. The narrative that had been presented was that the administration had restored economic confidence and “brought jobs back.” Now, with this information, there’s a serious challenge to this claim. Even before the numbers, there were indications that many voters weren’t feeling confident, as shown by election results in different states.
The situation also highlights a shift in the labor market. We’re moving from a situation where workers had job security to one where companies are cutting costs and reducing staff. There is the argument that AI is a factor, but the cause may be more tied to overall costs and reduced revenue in many sectors.
Many people are noticing and calling this out. Some of us also work in automation and AI and agree, that the cuts are due to increased costs and lower revenue in most sectors and not directly tied to the AI capacity boom, but budgets.
The consequences of these actions are evident. Companies are cutting costs and the remaining employees are now responsible for more work, potentially leading to burnout. This situation, of course, isn’t helping the overall economy, and there’s a lot of concern about the future.
This is what happens when, some would argue, certain economic strategies are used. For some, the tariffs that were imposed are a contributing factor, as are issues that create an uncertain environment for investors and global supply chains. Some say that those actions led to these results.
When promises are made to boost the economy, and instead, people are seeing job losses, it creates a real disconnect. When this happens, it is understandable that there’s a lot of frustration and concern about the direction of things. This is the outcome of a situation that many people feel could have been avoided.