By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During his White House visit, President Donald Trump warmly embraced Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, dismissing U.S. intelligence findings that implicated the Crown Prince in the 2018 killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. Trump praised Prince Mohammed as an indispensable player in the Middle East and announced Saudi Arabia’s increased investment in the U.S. Furthermore, Trump announced agreements including the sale of F-35 fighter jets, a defense agreement, and designation of Saudi Arabia as a major non-NATO ally, despite concerns about human rights and potential conflicts of interest. The visit also aimed to advance the Abraham Accords and normalize relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia, though the Saudis insisted on a path to Palestinian statehood first.
Read the original article here
Trump dismisses US intelligence that Saudi prince was likely aware of the 2018 killing of journalist. It’s almost expected at this point, isn’t it? Like clockwork, whenever a piece of inconvenient information emerges, especially one that reflects poorly on someone with power and, let’s face it, money, a certain playbook gets dusted off. In this case, it involved brushing aside the findings of his own country’s intelligence agencies, those supposed experts who spend their lives gathering and analyzing information, in favor of a guy with a reputation, a lot of oil, and an apparent lack of regard for human life.
Trump dismisses intelligence because that’s what he does. It’s a pattern we’ve seen time and time again. Remember the Russian election interference? The agencies said one thing, he said another. He seemingly trusted Putin’s denials more than his own country’s experts. It’s a familiar routine, one that consistently prioritizes personal relationships and financial incentives over facts and, quite frankly, basic moral considerations.
Trump dismisses intelligence because, let’s be frank, it benefits him. The complexities of international relations, the nuances of intelligence reports – these things take a backseat when there’s a shiny object to chase or a wealthy individual to appease. It’s as if offering “something shiny or expensive” is the ultimate trump card, silencing any concerns or criticisms. This is not the behavior one would expect from a leader.
Trump dismisses intelligence, and it highlights a stark contrast in priorities. It’s a story of money over morals, of personal gain trumping the principles of justice and accountability. It’s also a reminder of the fragility of truth in a world where power and influence often dictate the narrative. This isn’t just about one specific event. It’s about a broader disregard for the institutions and values that are supposed to guide a nation.
Trump dismisses intelligence because, for him, the equation is simple. Journalists, with their pesky questions and their relentless pursuit of truth, are headaches. Saudi princes, on the other hand, well, they have something to offer. It’s about access, power, and, of course, the ever-present allure of financial gain. This wasn’t just a political misstep; it was a demonstration of a deeply ingrained value system, one that often seemed to favor personal advancement over the welfare of others.
Trump dismisses intelligence, and the implications are significant. It sends a message, both domestically and internationally, about what matters. It normalizes hypocrisy, making it acceptable to prioritize self-interest over even the most heinous acts. It also undermines the credibility of US intelligence agencies, damaging their ability to do their jobs and eroding public trust in their findings.
Trump dismisses intelligence. It’s a reflection of a mindset, a way of operating that seems to disregard the standard rules of governance. It’s a pattern of prioritizing those who offer him something, while dismissing those who challenge him or stand in his way. It’s a world where the pursuit of wealth and influence seemingly trumps even the most basic human rights.
Trump dismisses intelligence and the language used here is key. “Likely aware” versus “ordered” are very different things. The distinction matters. This is a situation where actions speak louder than words, where the dismissal of intelligence is an act of defiance, a statement about what this leader truly values. The choice to downplay the findings, to protect a powerful figure, reveals the true nature of his priorities.
Trump dismisses intelligence, and the world takes notice. It’s a sign of a broader trend, a growing normalization of questionable behavior. In this situation, the dismissal isn’t just a political decision; it’s a moral one. It’s a statement about what kind of world this former president, and in many ways, those around him, wanted to create. It is a world where wealth and power buy immunity, and where truth is often a casualty.
Trump dismisses intelligence, once again. This whole situation is a stark reminder of the importance of holding those in power accountable. It’s about demanding transparency, upholding the rule of law, and ensuring that our leaders act in the best interests of the people. Otherwise, the cycle continues, and the world is left to grapple with the consequences.