By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Donald Trump is seeking to overturn the jury’s verdict in a civil lawsuit where he was found liable for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll and later defaming her. His legal team argues that the $5 million verdict was based on “indefensible evidentiary rulings,” allowing “inflammatory propensity evidence.” Trump’s lawyers claim the trial judge warped federal evidence rules to support Carroll’s claims, which they call a “politically motivated hoax.” The appeal to the Supreme Court follows a denial by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, who upheld the original verdict.
Read the original article here
Trump asks Supreme Court to throw out E. Jean Carroll’s $5 million verdict. It’s truly astonishing, isn’t it, to see the Supreme Court potentially being used in this way? It feels as though it’s become a direct line of access, a sort of “I want it now” mechanism for Trump’s every demand. It’s hard not to be disgusted by the idea of the Supreme Court acting like Trump’s personal “I want a manager” button. And the speed with which they seem to jump at the opportunity is even more concerning, especially given that six of the justices might be inclined to do so. Hasn’t he paid her yet? The whole situation feels like an abuse of power.
Trump asks Supreme Court to throw out E. Jean Carroll’s $5 million verdict and one has to wonder, what does the U.S. Supreme Court even have to do with state and local courts, anyway? How is this even allowed? It’s as though Trump views the Supreme Court as a personal search engine, ready to fulfill his every whim. The situation highlights a troubling aspect of his character. This is more than just a financial matter; it’s a direct challenge to the legal system. It’s about accountability, about the consequences of actions, and about the very fabric of our laws.
Trump asks Supreme Court to throw out E. Jean Carroll’s $5 million verdict and that’s not even about the money; it’s about the principle. This individual could easily have paid the settlement, and made the problem disappear but his obsession with money fuels irrational decisions, and that obsession is now putting pressure on the highest court in the land. The verdict against him is a legal fact. If the Supreme Court were to throw out a civil verdict like this, it would be a devastating blow to the integrity of our judicial system. It would send a message that the powerful are above the law.
Trump asks Supreme Court to throw out E. Jean Carroll’s $5 million verdict. The question is how many times does he get to appeal this? The argument seems to be, there was no evidence, no witnesses, and no investigation. Then one has to ask, how many people would be brought back as well? It’s about a man who was found to have committed sexual assault. He was sued. He was found guilty. And now he’s turning to the Supreme Court as his last resort. It’s a sad state of affairs when the highest court could become a play toy.
Trump asks Supreme Court to throw out E. Jean Carroll’s $5 million verdict and that should not happen. He got caught! It’s not the $5 million he cares about, it’s admitting he was caught. It’s about his reputation, about the perception of his power, and about trying to maintain control. It should be a matter of holding him accountable for his actions. It’s also about a justice system that works, or at least is supposed to work. This kind of case is not one of those cases, where the constitution plays a role. It’s a matter of personal wrongdoing.
Trump asks Supreme Court to throw out E. Jean Carroll’s $5 million verdict; shouldn’t he be in prison? All of his rape victims deserve justice, but it seems unlikely that will happen if the Supreme Court is involved. His use of the Supreme Court as a personal tool is disturbing, especially given the seriousness of the allegations against him. They are the final gatekeepers of justice, and this should not be one of their concerns.
Trump asks Supreme Court to throw out E. Jean Carroll’s $5 million verdict. If the Supreme Court agrees to hear the arguments, it will be the end of its credibility. Trump’s actions, and the potential complicity of the Supreme Court, are a sign that the country is failing. The final straw in SCOTUS’s credibility will be broken when they agree to hear arguments on this case. There is absolutely no fucking way that SCOTUS should be used like this.
Trump asks Supreme Court to throw out E. Jean Carroll’s $5 million verdict, and the reason is probably quite simple: because he can. He clearly doesn’t care about the consequences of his actions. He’s repeatedly defamed her, got a verdict against him, and then doubled and tripled down on it. It’s about not wanting to admit he was wrong. It’s about ego. It’s about power. It’s about a man who is used to getting what he wants, no matter the cost.
Trump asks Supreme Court to throw out E. Jean Carroll’s $5 million verdict. But he’s also an adjudicated rapist and he deserves to be held fully accountable. What is the constitutionality of a pedophile diddling a woman in a fitting room? The fact that a case like this is even being considered by the Supreme Court is a sign that things are broken.