By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump’s approval rating has plummeted to a new low, dipping into double-digit negative territory according to RealClearPolling’s national average. This decline follows the longest government shutdown in history, which appears to be fueling public discontent, as evidenced by polls from various organizations. The shutdown has disrupted essential programs like SNAP, impacting millions and leading to accusations of weaponizing hunger. While lawmakers continue to seek a solution to end the shutdown, the president’s approval rating and Republican prospects in the upcoming midterm elections are at stake.
Read the original article here
Donald Trump’s approval rating plunges to a double-digit deficit, and it seems like everyone has an opinion on it. It’s a recurring headline, and you can almost set your watch by it. The general sentiment seems to be a mix of “it’s about time” and “does it even matter?” There’s a noticeable weariness towards the constant reporting on approval ratings, with many feeling like the numbers don’t reflect the reality of the situation. Some are quick to point out the disconnect between these ratings and the unwavering support he still receives from a significant portion of the population, particularly within the Republican party.
The core issue seems to be the perceived impact of his actions on everyday Americans. Mention of economic hardships, rising healthcare costs, and the overall feeling of being “left behind” are woven throughout the commentary. The idea that people are struggling financially while those in power seem detached from their struggles is a recurring theme. The phrase “Marie Antoinette” makes an appearance, hinting at a leader who seems out of touch with the public’s concerns. There’s a clear sense that the current administration’s policies are viewed as detrimental to the financial well-being of a large segment of the population.
The focus shifts to the reliability and relevance of the polls themselves. There’s skepticism about the accuracy and significance of these numbers, especially when they seem to consistently hover around a certain threshold. Some people question why Newsweek seems so fixated on the subject, while others point out that other sources, like Nate Silver’s aggregator, also reflect a downward trend. The use of phrases like “made-up junk” and the general lack of trust in the polling process highlight a broader distrust in mainstream media. There’s a feeling that these polls are not an accurate reflection of the public’s sentiment, or that they are being used to push a particular narrative.
A strong point is made about the implications of the approval ratings. The lack of enthusiasm and the perceived lack of care is evident in the comments. A lot of people believe that the existing support is steadfast and immune to the impact of the approval ratings. This sentiment implies that the President’s base of support is unwavering and that the numbers will not make an impact. There’s the underlying feeling that the president’s ability to remain in power isn’t tied to public approval, but more to the loyalty of his supporters and the power structure.
Ultimately, the responses underscore a complex view of the situation. People are concerned with the state of the economy. Some think he shouldn’t be President. The constant discussion regarding his approval ratings is something that has grown old and does not hold much significance. A portion of the country will support him despite any negative factors. The conversations suggest a lack of faith in the system to hold him accountable. The general consensus appears to be that, while the “plunging” approval rating is noted, its significance is questioned, with the focus instead on the tangible effects of policy and the resilience of his base of support.