By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Beginning Monday, the Trump administration was set to gain expanded authority to take action against Venezuela by designating the Venezuelan government as a foreign terrorist organization. This designation, focused on the “Cartel de los Soles,” allows for sanctions against Maduro’s assets and infrastructure, potentially expanding military options. Concurrently, the US military has increased its presence in the region with numerous warships and troops, as officials discuss various action options. Despite this, a recent poll indicates significant public opposition to US military intervention in Venezuela, while the administration claims its focus is on combating illegal activities with regime change as a potential side effect.
Read the original article here
Trump administration formally designates Venezuela’s Maduro as member of a foreign terrorist organization – that’s quite a loaded statement, isn’t it? It immediately raises a lot of questions. If Maduro is officially labeled a terrorist, it certainly throws international relations into a whirlwind. The immediate thought that pops into my head is, why Maduro and not others? Why now?
The whole situation seems to be a clever maneuver designed to bypass the usual protocols of international law and, let’s be honest, to justify aggressive actions. It’s like a convenient loophole. Maduro is a terrorist, but what about other leaders who are accused of similar actions? Putin? Netanyahu? Kim Jong Un? Erdogan? The inconsistencies immediately start to stand out, and the word “terrorist” seems to lose its gravity when it’s tossed around so casually. It begins to feel like a political tool, rather than a genuine concern for human lives or international security.
It’s difficult not to be cynical. The timing feels strategic, and the focus seems to be about more than just the political landscape of Venezuela. The underlying motivation is crystal clear: Venezuela has some of the largest proven oil reserves in the world. So, it’s not a huge leap to conclude that the designation is a potential precursor to actions, perhaps even an invasion. “No Blood for Oil” signs certainly seem relevant here. It reminds me of the arguments used to justify the Iraq War. “Weapons of Mass Destruction” or a “War on Terror” – all convenient pretexts.
The potential consequences are serious. Such a designation is a clear signal that this administration is not serious. They are creating a “casus belli” – a reason for war. And when you look at how this administration has handled other foreign policy matters, it’s hard to trust their motives. You have to wonder about the long-term effects on the country and its people. This is not about the freedom or well-being of the Venezuelan people; it’s about control of resources, plain and simple.
Now, think about the Venezuelan people themselves. They’ve endured so much. They’ve had to make tough choices just to survive, often facing starvation and hardship. They have had to leave their families behind and do low-paying work just to make ends meet. From their perspective, Maduro is a terrorist, a killer, a thief. The point is that the real tragedy is the immense suffering of the Venezuelan people, who have lived under such a corrupt and tyrannical regime for so long.
The contrast between the realities of life in Venezuela and the detached pronouncements of this administration is jarring. While the rhetoric might focus on democracy, the underlying narrative is far simpler. It’s all about access to Venezuelan oil. The administration’s actions seem less about humanitarian concerns and more about strategic resource acquisition. It’s hard not to feel like this is another chapter in a familiar story, repeating the same patterns of power and control.
One of the most troubling aspects of this is the devaluation of the word “terrorist.” It’s become so commonplace that it has lost its impact. And when a term as serious as this becomes politicized, it loses its meaning and serves the administration’s goals only. It’s a convenient tool for justifying whatever action they may want to take. The whole thing feels like a distraction.
This makes you wonder about the long-term implications. The possibility of military intervention, the potential for further destabilization, and the ongoing suffering of the Venezuelan people – it’s a grim picture. It’s a reminder that beneath the surface of international politics, there are often hidden motives, a complex web of power, and, unfortunately, a history of repeating mistakes. This is, in fact, an oil war, and for the benefit of whose bank accounts? It’s a sad state of affairs.
This all creates a feeling of unease. It’s a situation where everyone loses, and the most vulnerable pay the highest price. This administration’s actions are nothing more than bullying and terroristic actions towards another nation and its people.