By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The White House is claiming war powers restrictions do not apply to the recent military strikes on alleged drug traffickers, despite the 60-day window stipulated by the War Powers Resolution having closed. This assertion is based on the argument that the strikes do not constitute “hostilities,” a stance that could allow the government to continue these actions without congressional approval. Critics argue that this interpretation is a legal abuse, and further, could expand the scope of military action without congressional oversight, including potential action against Venezuela. Meanwhile, the Pentagon is moving to send troops into Mexico.
Read the original article here
The Trump administration’s actions regarding congressional War Powers restrictions and the announced Mexico campaign are, well, a lot to unpack. First, the administration is reportedly claiming that War Powers restrictions simply don’t apply to its actions against alleged drug traffickers. That’s a bold legal move, and I think we all understand that such a claim is a pretty big deal. It essentially gives the President a green light to do what he wants, when he wants, without Congressional oversight. Now, some might call this a “legal wrinkle,” but, if you ask me, that’s a serious oversimplification. This isn’t just a matter of interpreting laws; it’s about potentially bypassing them altogether, which is a slippery slope.
Now, let’s talk about the Mexico campaign itself. Reports indicate that the US military is planning operations, including ground operations inside Mexico, targeting the cartels. The question on everyone’s mind is, is this at the invitation of Mexico, or are we talking about an outright invasion? The fact that the deployment isn’t “imminent” is supposed to reassure us, but the early stages of training have already begun. So, what’s going on? It’s a tricky situation. On one hand, the cartel issue is a serious one, with devastating consequences on both sides of the border. On the other hand, a military intervention in Mexico raises all sorts of red flags.
And here’s where the context is important: Many people expressed concerns about the “peace president” potentially going to war. Promises were made about avoiding foreign entanglements. Seeing these developments unfold, it’s hard not to feel a sense of whiplash. The fact that the administration is even considering such a move is, frankly, unsettling. It’s especially unsettling considering how this administration has dismantled and defunded the very agencies designed to monitor and manage the problems. If this were truly about addressing the root causes of addiction and border issues, there would be a different approach.
Now, some of us can’t help but ask, what about all the underlying issues? There’s a widespread feeling that the current administration is focused on things that will make headlines, rather than address the core problems. The extrajudicial bombings, war crimes, and military escalation seem to be about something other than solving the problem. As someone said, the election results appear to be a trigger. The administration needs to make new headlines. It’s a diversion. And let’s not pretend this is about the drug crisis. It’s about regime change and interventionism.
The reactions range from outright fear to a sort of weary resignation. There’s talk about potential quagmires and the risk of civilian casualties. There are serious questions about Congressional oversight and the implications of an administration that seems to believe it’s above the law. Some suggest that a collaborative approach, involving the US, Mexico, and other countries, would be a more sensible solution. Others express distrust, which is totally understandable given the administration’s track record. There’s a lot of concern that this will turn into another Vietnam, or worse.
Of course, the whole thing is happening against the backdrop of an ongoing political drama, with an administration that some people feel is overstepping its boundaries. The question of whether this is the US declaring war on drug organizations is very valid. People are asking, what is this about? Is it some sort of desperate attempt to grab headlines, or is it something more sinister?
The potential for this to escalate is huge. The implications for the US, Mexico, and the wider region are serious. We need to be wary of the rhetoric and understand what we’re being told. The details are still emerging, but what’s clear is that this is not just a straightforward military operation. It’s a complex, fraught situation, and we need to approach it with a clear head and a critical eye.