By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A social media creator is facing criticism after allegedly hitting and killing a pedestrian while livestreaming on TikTok in a Chicago suburb. Following the incident, the creator solicited donations for “mental leave,” prompting outrage from viewers. The 59-year-old pedestrian, Darren Lucas, was pronounced dead at the hospital after being struck at an intersection. Authorities are investigating the crash and are aware of a video appearing to show the incident, but no charges have been filed.
Read the original article here
Outcry as TikTok livestreamer who allegedly hit and killed man asks for donations sparks a firestorm of criticism, and for good reason. It’s almost unbelievable that someone who is allegedly responsible for such a tragedy would then turn around and solicit money from the public. The whole scenario feels deeply wrong, and it’s understandable that people are reacting with anger and disbelief.
The core issue here seems to be a profound disconnect from reality. The livestreamer, according to reports, was driving with children in the car when the incident occurred. Then, adding another layer of shock, she reportedly announced a new album series while discussing the incident, as if it was merely an inconvenience or a business opportunity. This suggests a disturbing lack of empathy and a prioritization of self-promotion over everything else. The details of the accident are obviously serious, and it is a situation where many people are experiencing some form of shock. To then act as if it is not so is an obvious sign of a disconnect from reality.
One can’t help but wonder what values are at play here. The fact that someone would even consider asking for donations in this situation exposes a disturbing mindset. It raises questions about what motivates these actions and what kind of support system these individuals rely on. It’s hard to imagine what value someone thinks they are getting by sending this kind of person their hard-earned money.
There’s also a clear feeling that TikTok and other social media platforms might bear some responsibility. If the streaming while driving was happening live then the platform, which is already a huge financial success, could be considered to be profiting from unsafe behavior. The question has also been raised whether the company is prioritizing profit over the safety of its users and the public. There’s a general consensus that platforms need to find ways to prevent this kind of dangerous behavior. People are asking why they aren’t disabling the ability to livestream while in a moving vehicle. Technology certainly exists to do so, and even relatively simple solutions like GPS-based restrictions have proven effective in other contexts.
The issue of distracted driving is a constant topic of concern, and this situation brings it into sharp focus. Streaming while driving is already a well-known incredibly dangerous activity. It’s no different than being drunk behind the wheel. The fact that the streamer was apparently more concerned with her audience than with the safety of herself, her passengers, and other people on the road is chilling. The fact that she can ask people for money is appalling to most people, and the fact that she doesn’t seem to think it is, is quite disturbing.
Many people are also pointing out the wider societal issues that are reflected in this situation. There’s a concern that society is fostering narcissism and a culture of self-absorption, where people prioritize self-promotion and validation over all else. The incident has caused many people to ask questions like, Are influencers a blight on society? It certainly appears to be the case when something like this happens.
There’s also a significant amount of anger directed towards the individual involved. The comments are filled with harsh words, reflecting the deep sense of betrayal and disgust that many people feel. There’s a sense that she doesn’t care about anyone but herself. This has been supported by the fact that she was allegedly laughing after the fact. It seems that she doesn’t want any type of accountability for her actions.
At the same time, many people are asking why the platform has not taken action. This has caused many people to feel like they are actively rewarding psychopaths. While TikTok will likely wait to see what comes from the authorities, it is still their responsibility to act.
It’s also important to note that many people are not defending the streamer, and they understand that there are no excuses for her behavior. At the same time, some people think about how they wish they could make a living by doing the things they love.
There’s a strong call for accountability in this case. People want to see the authorities take the proper steps to address the alleged crime, and they are also looking for platforms like TikTok to take responsibility for enabling this type of behavior. There’s a general consensus that safety should be the number one priority. In fact, if something like this happens than they should be recording it.