By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Tesla shareholders have approved a compensation package for Elon Musk that could potentially make him the world’s first trillionaire. The package, approved by over 75% of the votes cast, would grant Musk up to 423.7 million additional shares over the next decade if the company achieves specific operational and financial targets. To receive the full payout, Tesla’s market capitalization needs to reach $8.5 trillion. This award comes as Musk shifts the company’s focus towards self-driving cars and humanoid robots, despite facing current financial challenges.
Read the original article here
Tesla shareholders approve a $1 trillion pay package for Musk, and honestly, the whole thing feels surreal, like something ripped straight from a satirical science fiction novel. The fact that this is even a headline is mind-boggling, a stark reminder of the widening gap between the ultra-wealthy and everyone else. The US, it seems, might get its first trillionaire before it even establishes universal healthcare. It’s a statement that just hangs in the air, a commentary on societal priorities that feels both absurd and depressing.
The specifics of the package are crucial to understanding its implications, even though the headline numbers alone are enough to cause a double take. It is important to know that while the headline number is staggering, it’s not a direct payout. Musk isn’t going to have a trillion dollars in his bank account tomorrow. The deal is structured around massive increases in Tesla’s market value and substantial vehicle delivery targets. He needs to propel the company to incredible heights. The stock would need to experience exponential growth, reaching an $8.5 trillion market capitalization, and the company would need to deliver a whopping 20 million vehicles. It’s essentially a bet on Tesla becoming not just a dominant player in the automotive industry, but arguably the dominant economic force on the planet.
This pay package, to a large extent, puts the nail in the coffin of any remaining belief in tying executive compensation to actual performance. Tesla’s financial performance hasn’t exactly been stellar lately. Reports indicate a significant drop in profits year-over-year. Yet, this is the very same moment shareholders are considering this colossal reward. The package is less about rewarding past achievements and more about incentivizing future success. But the targets seem impossibly high, which leads to the impression that it’s more about inflating the stock price through sheer hype and the cult of personality surrounding Musk. It’s like they could have proposed a “bajillion” dollar package and it would have been just as realistic.
The sheer scale of the potential payout is almost impossible to comprehend. When we’re talking about a trillion dollars, we’re operating in realms of financial reality that most people simply can’t grasp. A billion is a lot, but a trillion? It’s a thousand billions, a number that’s so vast that it transcends the limits of our everyday understanding of wealth. It’s a sum that could, theoretically, be used to solve major global problems, yet is destined for one person. It’s not just about the numbers; it’s about the signals it sends, the message it broadcasts about the values of our society.
The sentiment that dominates is one of disgust. Many people feel this is simply unethical, that it reflects a system where a single individual’s potential earnings vastly outweigh the resources available for the well-being of the wider population. The contrast is stark: the possibility of a trillionaire existing while so many people struggle with basic needs. It is seen by many as a clear indication that a class war is happening and it is already won. The focus has clearly moved away from the product, the car, and towards the personality of the leader.
The core argument being made by those opposing the package is that Musk’s value to Tesla is being highly inflated. Some believe the company’s success hinges on his cult of personality rather than on any intrinsic value. They suggest that Tesla is overvalued and propped up by the hype he generates. It is even suggested that without Musk, Tesla would flounder. In this view, he is more a symbol of marketing prowess than a genuine driver of innovation.
This situation appears to show the reality that investors will tolerate almost anything if the stock price goes up, and there’s a certain segment that is completely captivated by the Elon Musk personality. The package is seen as a way to keep this momentum going, even if it means overlooking questionable behavior or ignoring ethical concerns. It is the hope that it will work out, even if the math doesn’t add up. Many investors are not reading the room and it is believed that they will lose their investment.
The opposition also expresses real concerns. The size of the compensation raises serious questions about whether any individual, no matter how influential, is truly worth this much. The criticism also extends to the implications for income inequality. The focus on individual wealth accumulation at this level is seen as a detriment to society as a whole. This is a class war and this is how it’s being won.
The overall sentiment is negative. It’s a feeling of bewilderment. Many believe this is an injustice, a symptom of a sick system. It’s a feeling of powerlessness, and a call to action. The responses are an outcry against an economic system that allows for such disparity and a sense of despair for the future. The conclusion is that they will suffer financially if they continue to support this and calls for a boycott, divestment, and sanction.