By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The article posits a clash between “end-of-the-world fascism” (EWF) and civil disobedience, with EWF currently holding the advantage due to its control over resources and political structures. EWF thrives on violence and maintains power through manipulation of corporate interests and the exploitation of the working class. Resistance faces challenges, including fragmented social classes and the co-option of political movements by corporate agendas within the Republican and Democratic parties. Ultimately, the article urges a shift in perspective, suggesting that the impending end of food assistance programs presents an opportunity for the educated professional class to unite with the abandoned working class and engage in mass protest.
Read the original article here
As SNAP Ends, No Kings Protesters Must Unite With the Abandoned Poor
The ending of SNAP benefits is a critical juncture, and the response from those protesting “No Kings” must be decisive. The focus must shift to uniting with the abandoned poor, recognizing that the fight against authoritarianism and the struggle for basic survival are intertwined. It’s time to realize the connection between fighting an overreaching government and providing food security.
The protests against the current administration and its policies must expand to address the practical needs of the people. This means actively supporting food banks, organizing community events, and ensuring that those facing hardship receive essential resources. Perhaps the “No Kings” rallies could integrate food drives, creating a tangible impact while advocating for change. Imagine a “No Kings” event where participants donate food items, providing immediate relief and demonstrating solidarity.
The potential for a broad coalition exists, encompassing those who may have previously held opposing views. The shared experience of economic hardship can transcend political divides, and the movement could find common ground with those whose benefits are disappearing. Reaching out and providing support isn’t about agreeing on everything; it’s about helping people stay fed and housed. The message should be clear: “No Kings” means no one starves. The actions of the current administration are authoritarian, so it is necessary to call for change from multiple sides, including those that previously supported the administration, even if that support was based in misinformation or mistrust.
There should be a noticeable presence of support for SNAP and against authoritarianism. To emphasize this, a “NO KINGS” marking on anything that has SNAP-accepted will serve as a constant reminder that these two issues are linked. It serves as a stark reminder to those who may be inclined to support harmful policies that some of the actions of their favored leaders are hurtful to the most vulnerable. It also shows a commitment to providing tangible support.
The discussion needs to pivot towards practical solutions. The idea of a general strike is appealing, but it requires significant organization and the commitment of a large percentage of the population to be effective. For the immediate future, mutual aid networks can provide essential support. It would be important to create systems where people can support each other without needing to purchase resources. This is key to building worker power and achieving a lasting shift in power.
The strategy includes organizing workplaces and supporting unionization efforts. These actions build worker power and provide a means of collective action, offering protection and support that individuals might lack. This isn’t a quick fix, but a long-term strategy for change. Educating people about their rights and the power of collective action is an essential part of the process, and this should be done in day-to-day interactions. The protest should be more about educating people, and less about complaining. The most effective approach involves meeting people where they are, by the water cooler, in the workplace, or in their communities.
The key is for movements to recognize the interconnectedness of their causes, and work together. Instead of allowing differences to divide, the focus must be on shared struggles and common goals. This includes recognizing the need for those who have been marginalized. This goes for all movements, including the BLM protests and any others who are focused on the safety and well-being of the population. There should be a unified front for those facing economic hardship and systemic oppression. There is a need to remember the struggles and fears of those who might support another party, and welcome them into the fold if they can overcome that fear and help those in need.
Ultimately, the goal is to fight the authoritarian actions that allow a few to exploit the many. We need to build a system of mutual support, where basic needs are met and where everyone has a voice. “No Kings” must evolve from a statement to a movement that embodies those values and actively works to make them a reality. The fight for justice starts with showing up and being there to help.