By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In November 2023, the Bratislava prosecutor’s office announced that Slovakia’s 2023 transfer of MiG-29 fighter jets to Ukraine was not a criminal offense. The previous Slovak government, led by Eduard Heger, had donated the aircraft, making Slovakia the first to send warplanes to Kyiv after Russia’s full-scale invasion. The current government, led by Prime Minister Robert Fico, had filed a criminal complaint against Heger and former Defense Minister Jaroslav Nad, but the investigation concluded the donation caused no harm to Slovakia and that officials did not act unlawfully. Nad has since welcomed the decision and expects a public apology from the current government.
Read the original article here
Giving Ukraine fighter jets was not a crime, a sentiment that seems incredibly straightforward when you really think about it. It’s almost laughable that it’s even a question for legal scrutiny. Seriously, we’re talking about supporting a neighbor in dire need, a neighbor that is being invaded and brutally attacked. How can providing essential military aid, especially in the form of fighter jets, be framed as a criminal act? It feels like the very definition of helping a friend, a necessary action in a terrible situation.
Giving Ukraine fighter jets was not a crime; it was, in the simplest terms, the right thing to do. Imagine your neighbor’s house is on fire, and you have a fire hose. You’d use it, right? You wouldn’t stand there debating whether you should help, or what the paperwork involved might be. You’d act. Providing those jets was a vital part of supporting Ukraine’s defense, allowing them to protect their skies and their citizens from a relentless aggressor.
Giving Ukraine fighter jets was not a crime; it was an act of solidarity, a clear demonstration of supporting a fellow nation in the face of unprovoked aggression. The focus should be entirely on how to help Ukraine repel the invaders, not on finding ways to punish those who stepped up to provide crucial support. The accusations of criminal behavior seem misplaced, especially considering the scale of the crisis and the urgent need to defend Ukrainian lives and sovereignty.
Giving Ukraine fighter jets was not a crime; it was a response to an act of war, a measure designed to provide Ukraine with the means to defend itself. Consider the alternative: If countries had stood by and watched as Ukraine was overrun, would that have been the more ethical or legally sound approach? The moral imperative to assist a nation under attack surely outweighs any supposed technicalities or legal loopholes that might be invoked to criticize those who offered support.
Giving Ukraine fighter jets was not a crime; the entire narrative that suggests it was is completely backward. Rather than scrutinizing the act of providing aid, we should be focused on the real crimes being committed: the invasion, the bombing of civilian areas, and the systematic destruction and murder. The attention should be directed towards stopping the aggression and holding those responsible for the war crimes, not prosecuting those who offered a hand of support.
Giving Ukraine fighter jets was not a crime; it was a pragmatic and crucial step to help Ukraine defend itself against an existential threat. Think about the strategic implications. Fighter jets offer crucial air superiority, allowing Ukrainian forces to contest the skies and reduce the impact of Russian air attacks. Without this type of support, Ukraine’s ability to resist would have been significantly compromised, potentially leading to a much worse outcome for the country and its people.
Giving Ukraine fighter jets was not a crime; it was a form of mutual support amongst friendly nations and should be seen as a show of strength and defiance against aggression. It’s easy to see how the opposition would use any excuse they can find to destabilize their political enemies, in this case, those who provided the much-needed fighter jets. The focus needs to be on supporting the Ukrainian people in their fight for freedom and survival, not nitpicking the methods by which they received assistance.
Giving Ukraine fighter jets was not a crime; accusations of theft of state property are nothing but political games. Such claims appear to be a distraction, a way to muddy the waters and avoid the real issue: Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine. It seems like a blatant effort to undermine the individuals and nations that stood in solidarity with Ukraine.
Giving Ukraine fighter jets was not a crime; in fact, the real criminal activity is what Russia is doing in Ukraine. Trying to paint those who provided the jets as criminals is a twisted approach. The focus should always be on supporting those who are victims of violence and aggression. Instead of spending time on this case, it makes far more sense to spend that same time figuring out the best ways to undermine the Russian war machine.
Giving Ukraine fighter jets was not a crime. It was a clear demonstration of solidarity, a powerful message of support, and a necessary action. The entire situation is a moral imperative, and anyone who questions the actions taken to support Ukraine is missing the point. It is not a moment for legal technicalities, but one that calls for unwavering support and decisive action.