By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Morgan Geyser, a defendant in the Slender Man case, is missing after removing her monitoring bracelet and leaving a group home in Madison, Wisconsin. Last seen on November 22nd with an adult acquaintance, Geyser’s current location is unknown, prompting a search led by the Madison Police Department with assistance from other suburban agencies. Authorities were notified on the morning of November 23rd, approximately 12 hours after she was last seen. The 23-year-old was previously committed for the attempted homicide of a classmate in 2014, with the crime motivated by the fictional character, Slender Man.
Read the original article here
Slender Man defendant cut off monitoring bracelet, left group home, and it’s a story that’s got everyone talking, and honestly, it’s not hard to see why. The news has stirred up a perfect storm of reactions, ranging from genuine concern to a kind of morbid fascination. You can practically hear the true crime podcasters revving up their microphones, ready to dive deep into this unfolding situation. The whole thing definitely feels like the beginning of some dark legend, right?
I mean, the whole idea is unsettling. We’re talking about someone who was involved in a brutal crime, a crime rooted in delusion and mental instability, now back in the headlines. The fact that she was under court-ordered treatment in a group home, a location that was sealed by the court, just adds a layer of intrigue and mystery to it all. It’s hard not to wonder what went through her mind to make such a bold move. Removing that monitoring bracelet feels like a deliberate act, a clear defiance of the court’s orders.
It’s almost impossible to ignore the fact that there are real-world consequences to this, and those are definitely hitting home with people. The obvious concern is for the victim of the original crime, Payton Leutner, and that’s a very valid and completely understandable reaction. How does one feel when the person involved in the torturing and nearly killing of them is free, after getting out far sooner than the other person? It’s a terrifying thing to think about and is the reason why there should be protection sent to her.
And the discussion about the justice system is unavoidable. We’re left wondering why the sentencing seems so light, how it was possible to even be released so early. The contrast between the sentences and the subsequent release, the time spent and the nature of the crime, just doesn’t sit right with many people. Questions arise about the effectiveness of the initial confinement and treatment, and the level of supervision during her time at the group home. If a system fails to ensure the safety of the public, the public has the right to feel disappointed.
The circumstances of the situation are just as alarming. The very nature of the crime itself, the fact that a fictional character was a part of the motivation, the youth involved… it’s a lot to process. Now we have an individual who was influenced by a creepy internet character and is now on the run, it’s easy to see why the entire scenario feels like a twisted horror movie in real life. It also does nothing to ease the minds of those who believed that the original sentence was not harsh enough in the first place, or that she would one day be a danger to society again.
It’s also important to acknowledge the complexities of mental illness. We’re talking about someone who was clearly struggling with profound mental issues at the time of the original crime. That kind of mental illness isn’t just something you can “cure.” There’s a recognition that it’s a long, challenging journey, and the idea of a full, permanent recovery seems highly improbable in cases like these. Medication, therapy, and continuous support are crucial. And when those are gone, the situation worsens.
The fact that the courts are even going through these challenges suggests this person may not have a firm grasp on the consequences of her actions. This is not making excuses, but instead an acknowledgment of the mental state of a person that committed such a crime. One must consider if incarceration will make things better or worse.
Of course, the question of who might have been involved in her leaving the group home also pops up, and it’s something people are understandably curious about. Was someone involved in helping her go? Did she have contact with someone that groomed her and could now be influencing her?
Overall, this situation highlights a lot of difficult questions about justice, mental health, and public safety. It’s a situation where everyone is now left with the uncertainty of not knowing what the future holds.