By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite criticism from the Democratic base regarding the recent government shutdown compromise, no Senate Democrats have publicly called for Minority Leader Chuck Schumer to resign. Though any senator could instigate a vote to remove him, as reported by The American Prospect, even progressive figures like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have refrained from doing so. While some Democrats, like Chris Murphy, expressed disappointment with the deal, they stopped short of demanding Schumer’s removal. However, anger is reportedly brewing among House Democrats, with some, such as Seth Moulton, publicly advocating for Schumer’s resignation and challenging their colleagues to do the same. Progressive organizations like Indivisible are also putting pressure on Democrats, stating they will only support primary candidates who call for Schumer’s removal.
Read the original article here
Why Aren’t Any Senate Democrats Calling On Schumer to Step Down?
So, it’s pretty glaring, isn’t it? Despite the rising chorus of frustration and calls for change from progressives, it’s striking that no Senate Democrats are publicly backing a move to replace Chuck Schumer as their leader. You’ve got folks all over, from disillusioned donors to fired-up voters, letting it be known they’re done with the status quo, yet the silence from within the Senate Democratic caucus is deafening. It’s a real head-scratcher.
The reasons, as you might suspect, are layered and complex. One of the main factors seems to be the underlying dynamics of power and self-preservation within the party. Many see the current leadership as weak, and they’re not wrong, but rocking the boat and publicly calling for Schumer’s ouster is a big risk. It could alienate colleagues, damage relationships, and open the door to unwanted scrutiny. In the high-stakes game of Senate politics, keeping your head down and playing along often feels like the safest move.
Then there’s the issue of money and the influence of big donors. Let’s be real, campaigns cost a fortune, and those who write the big checks often have a significant say in how things are run. Corporate interests don’t exactly align with the progressive agenda that some are pushing. The current leadership, it could be said, is more aligned with the financial elite. It is much easier to just play along.
Plus, you’ve got this deeply ingrained party loyalty. Breaking ranks and openly challenging the leader goes against the unspoken code of the club. Senators are, in many ways, part of an exclusive club, a system that rewards those who play by the rules and punishes those who don’t. Al Franken’s experience is a sobering example of what can happen when you stray too far from the party line, and a lot of folks aren’t exactly eager to follow in his footsteps.
There’s the fact that they’re all in it together. The system is designed to keep the existing power structure intact. It’s about self-interest, with a lot of them having no interest in changing the status quo, even if it benefits the country. Why risk your cushy job and benefits when the current arrangement is working just fine for them? The status quo also works for those with inside information as they can use it to make even more money. They are not incentivized to change things.
Another perspective is that some of the more moderate Democrats see catering to progressives as a losing strategy. The constant threat of losing moderate votes looms large. These moderate senators are more focused on appealing to a broader base of voters. That can mean the progressive side of the party is forced to take a back seat.
The lack of any real pressure from Republicans is also a contributing factor. The media and the public tend to focus more on the internal squabbles. If the opposite side does not care, why should you?
Finally, there’s the underlying sentiment that this is a class war. The fear of electing people who will actually fix the economy for everyone, not just the wealthy, is a strong deterrent for those who benefit from the current system. Replacing Schumer could upset the balance, potentially leading to policies that would undermine their interests.
The simple fact is that the current system protects the elite. The only thing that seems to be able to overcome the status quo is mass grassroots pressure, and a united front from the voters to elect true progressives. Because until that happens, the silence from the Senate Democrats on the matter of Schumer’s leadership will likely persist.