By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a recent Facebook post, candidate Wilson expressed elation with the latest vote count, positioning her campaign with an almost 2,000-vote lead, indicating an insurmountable advantage. The campaign, fueled by grassroots efforts, focused on key issues such as affordability, mass transit improvements, and addressing Seattle’s homeless population. Wilson, who is open to being labeled a Democrat or a socialist, highlighted the public’s frustration with elected officials and the urgent need for action on everyday challenges. This marked her first-ever run for office.
Read the original article here
Schumer Begged 2028 Dem Contenders Not to Criticize Shutdown Deal, and it seems like a lot of folks are utterly incensed by the whole thing. The consensus appears to be that the deal – if you can even call it that – was a massive letdown, a capitulation, a complete and utter failure to deliver anything meaningful for the Democrats or the American people. This sentiment is amplified by the perception that Schumer, the individual at the center of it all, is actively trying to silence any criticism, essentially begging potential 2028 contenders to keep their mouths shut. It’s safe to say this strategy isn’t exactly winning him any popularity contests.
The core of the frustration lies in the feeling that Democrats, under Schumer’s leadership, consistently fail to stand their ground. The narrative paints a picture of a party that’s constantly folding under pressure, getting nothing in return for their compromises, and enabling the opposing party’s agenda. Many are furious that there doesn’t seem to be a real win. The “deal” itself is seen as a betrayal of progressive values and a sign of weakness, and the fact that Schumer seems to want to sweep it under the rug only adds insult to injury. People are very vocal about the sentiment that it isn’t something to be proud of or protected from criticism.
The response to this alleged request is, well, explosive. The prevailing attitude is one of defiant opposition. Many of the opinions expressed are very clear about the desire for Schumer’s removal from leadership. They don’t just want him to back down; they want him gone. The call is for a fresh face, a new direction, a leader who isn’t afraid to fight and win. The word “loser” pops up quite a bit. The feeling is strong that the time for polite, moderate politics is over. Instead, people are calling for aggressive action and a willingness to challenge the status quo. Some comments suggest that the upcoming primary elections will be a testing ground for this sentiment.
This deep-seated anger is aimed at both Schumer and the broader Democratic establishment. They’re viewed as being out of touch, beholden to special interests, and more concerned with maintaining power than actually representing the people they serve. There’s a sense that the current leadership is actively hindering the progress of the party. The belief that they’re acting in bad faith, deliberately holding back on progress, is a common theme, especially in the context of the shutdown deal. The anger appears to be further fueled by the belief that the current leadership has become too comfortable, too complacent, and has lost sight of the core values the party is supposed to represent.
A significant part of the ire is also directed at the lack of tangible gains from the deal. The comments suggest that Democrats gave up crucial ground without receiving anything in return. The overwhelming sentiment is that the Democrats should have stood firm, pushed back harder, and fought for their priorities. There’s a sentiment of being held hostage, that the government is catering to the wealthy instead of its citizens. The constant “capitulation” is a major point of contention. The deal is seen not just as a failure but as an embarrassment, a sign of weakness that emboldens the opposition.
The situation seems ripe for a primary challenge. Many people are actively calling for primarying Schumer and anyone else who supported the deal. The message is clear: if you are perceived as weak, if you are perceived as selling out, you will face consequences. The existing leadership is viewed as the “controlled opposition,” and the only way to fix the situation is by voting in the primaries. This is seen as a way to force a change in the party’s direction. It is a demand for a leadership that reflects the wishes of its base.
There is also a strong feeling that the current political climate demands a more aggressive and uncompromising approach. The comments indicate that the days of playing nice and hoping for compromise are over. The mood seems to be one of “enough is enough,” and the people are pushing for more decisive action and leadership. The expectation is that 2028 contenders *should* criticize the deal, relentlessly, without apology. Any reluctance to do so is seen as a betrayal of the party’s values.
Finally, the whole episode appears to be viewed as a wake-up call. The prevailing sentiment is that the Democratic Party needs to undergo a fundamental shift. It needs new leadership, new strategies, and a renewed commitment to fighting for the American people. This entire situation surrounding the shutdown deal serves as a catalyst for a broader reckoning, a moment of truth for the party. The expectation now is that the old guard has to go.