By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Disgraced former Congressman George Santos announced his intention to leave New York City following Zohran Mamdani’s mayoral election victory. This statement came after Santos was pardoned and freed from jail by Donald Trump after a conviction for wire fraud and aggravated identity theft. His initial reaction to Mamdani’s win on social media was an expletive-laden rant against Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa. Santos’s abrupt departure from NYC was met with mixed reactions from his followers.
Read the original article here
George Santos claims he’s fleeing NYC over Zohran Mamdani: ‘Nice knowing you.’ Well, that’s certainly a headline that grabs your attention, isn’t it? The saga of George Santos, the man who seemingly fabricated every detail of his life, continues to unfold, this time with a dramatic exit from New York City on the cards. And the reason? Apparently, the looming presence of Zohran Mamdani, the newly elected, yet un-sworn-in, mayor of New York City, is too much for our favorite “congressman” to handle.
Mamdani isn’t even in office yet, but according to this narrative, he’s already causing criminals to pack their bags. That’s a pretty bold claim, suggesting some serious efficiency. It’s hard to ignore the irony, though, isn’t it? Santos, a man known for his elaborate lies and questionable dealings, is supposedly running scared from someone who hasn’t even officially started the job. Perhaps the true reason lies elsewhere, maybe the New York State investigations into his conduct. Or, maybe, the constant ridicule he faces while simply trying to go out in public, as the comments suggest.
So, where is this escape taking him? The general consensus seems to be that he’s heading to a place like Florida or Texas, states often seen as havens for those seeking a less scrutinizing environment. The speculation, however, is that he’s looking to avoid legal troubles, seeking refuge in a state that might be less inclined to extradite him. The general sentiment seems to be a resounding “good riddance” from the people of New York. The city appears to be collectively breathing a sigh of relief.
It’s interesting, this dynamic. The mere mention of Mamdani, who hasn’t even stepped into office yet, seems to have had this effect. It’s a testament to the high expectations. Could this be a sign of a changing tide in New York? Or is Santos simply finding an excuse to make a strategic retreat? The comments make light of Santos’s departure. The general public seems to believe he never even lived in the city anyway, which adds another layer to the absurdity of the situation.
The discussion also turns to the role of Donald Trump in this whole spectacle. Some believe Trump’s support, or at least his visibility, helped elevate Santos into the political spotlight. The suggestion is that Trump’s actions, perhaps inadvertently, created a situation where Santos was more popular, thereby making him a more effective candidate. If only Trump would keep quiet, the thinking goes, Santos might not have even been a thing. It’s a fascinating, if somewhat cynical, take on the current political climate.
The speculation that he is leaving because he’s broke is the most likely. Some express the belief that the media will relentlessly target Mamdani, highlighting every negative aspect of life in NYC. This is a common concern among those on the progressive end of the spectrum, who view NYC as an experiment. The theory is that if the city thrives, it could expose the issues that unrestrained capitalism has caused in other cities across the world. The concern, however, is that the very system he is trying to fix won’t allow this to happen.
The overall tone of the commentary is one of exasperation and a touch of schadenfreude. There is a clear feeling of relief that Santos is leaving, along with suggestions on where he might go. The suggestion that he is a “fraud” and a “loser” reflects the widespread disapproval of his actions. It’s as though the departure of George Santos is viewed as a win for the city.
The comments also reflect the complicated nature of Santos’s situation. He seems to have become a figure of both fascination and ridicule. The suggestion that he belongs behind bars, is a sentiment echoed by several commenters. His connection to Trump, also is another element of the narrative, highlighting the political divide. Ultimately, the departure of George Santos from NYC is less about the mayor and more about the consequences of his own actions and perhaps a desire to escape the spotlight he can no longer control.