By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A Russian missile and drone attack on the western Ukrainian city of Ternopil has resulted in at least 25 fatalities, including three children, and 73 injuries, including 15 children. The strikes, considered one of the deadliest in the region since the full-scale invasion, targeted residential flats, with significant damage reported. The Ukrainian air force claimed to have intercepted a significant number of missiles and drones, including some shot down by Western-supplied fighter jets, but requested continued and timely supplies of aviation weapons to bolster defense capabilities, highlighting the devastating impact of the attacks.
Read the original article here
Russian attack hits flats in one of the deadliest strikes on western Ukraine, and it’s hard to ignore the stark contrast in strategies. It’s almost as if Russia has a completely different definition of “winning” than what we’d expect. Instead of focusing on military targets, the attacks seem to be aimed at civilian infrastructure – power plants, shopping malls, and, tragically, apartment buildings. This raises a lot of questions about the actual goals and intentions. You have to wonder what they hope to achieve by terrorizing the population.
The human cost of these attacks is brutal. These strikes are deepening an already horrific crisis, and the consequences will be felt for years to come. Warfare in densely populated areas is always devastating, but attacks on civilian targets are a tragic reminder of the risks ordinary people face during conflict. It’s a particularly cruel way to wage war, and it’s not even efficient. The aim seems to be demoralization, breaking the country’s war support, and essentially forcing surrender.
The scale of the destruction is difficult to fathom, and the implications for the future are even more so. The sheer disregard for civilian life is horrifying. It’s as though there is a strategic aim to inflict maximum suffering on the population.
It is baffling, however, that Russia’s strategy seems to be centered around causing widespread suffering to the civilian population. One wonders how a nation can justify such actions. It’s like their win condition involves inflicting so many atrocities that they convince people to surrender. It’s not just morally reprehensible; it’s also incredibly inefficient.
There’s a clear pattern here. While Ukraine targets key infrastructure to inflict economic damage, Russia’s approach seems focused on breaking the will of the people. This raises the question of how to handle Russia when the war is over. How can justice be served for the countless war crimes? It’s a truly difficult situation.
It’s clear that the attacks are deliberate. It’s not an accident when Russia sends countless drones and missiles to hit civilian targets. There is no legitimate military value in targeting residential buildings so close to the Polish border. The city isn’t even near the front lines. The justification attempts, like saying there were hidden NATO weapon deposits in the flats, are simply absurd.
There is a disturbing amount of support for Russia in certain corners of the world, which is hard to understand. It is disheartening to see individuals defending the aggressor in this situation, but it is clear they are using code words, not directly saying what they mean.
The focus on the attacks on civilian infrastructure makes it clear that Russia is not operating as a professional military force. Their actions indicate that they have little regard for international law or the basic principles of warfare.
The conflict’s effect on Ukraine’s population cannot be overstated. The damage and casualties to soldiers and civilians, along with the migration of millions of Ukrainians, primarily women and children, will have devastating consequences down the road. All of this has only exacerbated the demographic crisis in the region, particularly concerning the lack of young adults and lowering birth rates and fertility levels, which the war has further exacerbated.
It’s tempting to imagine that Russia should be dismantled. After so many revolutions and the collapse of the Soviet Union, one would have hoped they’d reach a liberal democracy by now.
The lack of clarity in reporting is also noticeable, with each side trying to control the narrative. This makes the situation difficult to assess, as both sides focus on propaganda.
The whole situation is deeply disturbing. The attack on the flats is just one example of the tragic consequences of this war. The ongoing attacks serve as a reminder of the fragility of peace and the importance of protecting innocent civilians in times of conflict.