Russian President Vladimir Putin acknowledged a US plan to end the war in Ukraine could be a foundation for future agreements, confirming an upcoming meeting with a US delegation. However, he reiterated Russia’s demand for Ukrainian troop withdrawal from occupied territories, threatening to achieve this through military means. This stance, coupled with Russia’s maximalist demands, suggests slim chances for immediate resolution, despite ongoing negotiations and discussions of a revised peace plan.

Read the original article here

Putin says US plan could be ‘basis’ of a Ukraine deal, and this statement is, to put it mildly, quite something. It’s like a broken record at this point. For years now, the playbook seems to go something like this: Russia puts forth demands, often disguised as a peace plan, and then issues a veiled or not-so-veiled threat to escalate violence if those demands aren’t met. This time around, it’s supposedly a “US plan” that could serve as a starting point, but the unspoken implication – and sometimes, the very clearly spoken one – is that if Ukraine doesn’t cede territory, Russia will continue its attempts to seize it by force.

The very concept of using a “US plan” as a potential deal framework is a bit of a head-scratcher, given the history here. It strongly implies the Kremlin has a hand in crafting the proposals. Let’s be honest, Russia has been trying to take Ukrainian land by force for ages, so this “threat” feels less like a warning and more like a continuation of the same strategy that hasn’t exactly yielded the desired results. It’s like saying, “I might stop punching you if you just give me your wallet.”

The constant threat of force is the same old song and dance. It’s important to remember that this “force” hasn’t exactly been winning the day. The conflict has dragged on for years, with Russia suffering significant losses, all the while failing to achieve its core objectives. The fact that the threat of force is still being touted as leverage speaks volumes about the current state of affairs.

It’s clear that the idea of Ukraine withdrawing from its own land is simply a non-starter. This suggestion seems completely disconnected from reality, especially given the sacrifices made by the Ukrainian people in defense of their territory. Any peace plan that doesn’t account for Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity is dead on arrival.

The entire situation underscores the disconnect between Russia’s perceived goals and its actual capabilities. This is especially true after the failed blitzkrieg turned into a long term struggle of attrition. This has been a complete catastrophe for Russia in terms of its reputation, its military strength, and its economy. The only force they seem to be able to muster is the one that’s been in play for the last few years, which hasn’t exactly been effective, and is nothing but a terror campaign of bombing civilian targets.

It seems Russia has been peddling its own agenda under the guise of the US plan. It’s difficult to avoid the conclusion that this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black. The notion that the US is somehow masterminding this, when it seems far more likely that Russia is behind the curtain, is more than a little absurd. It’s a tactic designed to sow confusion and division, attempting to portray their aims as somehow legitimate and the US as an unfair player.

When one truly examines the situation, it’s difficult not to conclude that Russia has already lost. They’ve failed to achieve their initial objectives, they’ve faced international condemnation, and they’ve caused immense suffering. Continuing to threaten further land grabs, while sounding defiant, really just emphasizes the ongoing failure to secure any of their goals and is a sign of weakness.

The whole thing feels like a last desperate attempt to salvage something from a disastrous situation. It’s a power play, trying to influence international opinion and perhaps provide some sort of justification to the Russian people. But honestly, it is mostly a sign of desperation. The idea that Russia can still dictate terms after the setbacks of the past few years is quite delusional.

The continued cycle of ultimatums and threats is both predictable and unproductive. A real path to peace requires a commitment to genuine negotiation, respect for international law, and recognition of Ukrainian sovereignty. The current approach is simply a continuation of the conflict. Until Russia is willing to negotiate in good faith and accept reality, the fighting will continue.