By Matt Underwood Putin Advisers Discuss Plans for Dealing With Trump: Transcript of leaked phone call. Let’s delve into this leaked phone call, offering a glimpse into the discussions between what appear to be high-level advisors within Putin’s inner circle, specifically concerning interactions with Donald Trump and his administration. The conversation, though brief and somewhat cryptic, provides some interesting insights into how Russia perceived and perhaps strategized its dealings with the former US President.
The primary subject matter of the call involves the transmission of a document, referred to as “the paper” or “the plan,” presumably outlining Russia’s position on a significant matter. The context suggests this relates to a potential negotiation or agreement, possibly regarding a conflict or geopolitical issue. The individuals involved are concerned with how this document will be handled by the American side, specifically concerning the degree to which it will be presented as Russia’s initiative.
The core of the discussion revolves around the informal delivery of the “paper” to a contact, identified as “Steve.” The advisor expresses a desire to have the plan delivered in such a way that it is clear it is Russia’s proposal. The worry is that the Americans might alter the plan or potentially present it as their own, thus obfuscating the origin and the true Russian position. This hints at a desire to control the narrative and maintain a degree of leverage in any potential negotiations.
The conversation reveals a cautious approach. The advisors are aware of the risks involved in directly submitting the plan and are considering the possibility that the Americans might not adopt their version precisely. It suggests a degree of distrust and a keen understanding of the potential for manipulation in international diplomacy. The emphasis on informality shows a strategic effort to allow the other side to claim ownership and to avoid an official association that could be detrimental to the negotiation process.
The nature of the relationship with “Steve” is also important. The advisors seem to trust him enough to deliver the plan, but not entirely, as they are concerned about how he will handle it. This suggests a delicate balance: the reliance on someone to act as a go-between, with the recognition of the need for careful management to avoid misrepresentation. The identity of “Steve” would provide valuable context to this call, but this is not identified in the call itself.
There’s a subtle undertone of concern about potential leaks or misinterpretations. This is evident in the worry that the American side might twist the plan or deny that it originated from Russia. The advisors recognize the importance of controlling the information flow and minimizing the risks of being misrepresented. This suggests a keen understanding of the power of public perception and the importance of shaping the narrative in their favor.
The conversation also points to a level of prior discussion and planning. The call is more of an update, suggesting that many of the core strategies have already been discussed. This shows that the participants are already aware of the complexities of the situation and the importance of discretion. The fact that the call feels like a brief check-in highlights the routine nature of these kinds of discussions for these individuals.
The mention of Saudi Arabia and the suggestion that one of the advisors was travelling there adds another layer to the conversation. This could imply a link to broader international dynamics and the possibility of aligning interests or seeking support in the region. This is another area where the details are missing, but the mention indicates a strategic dimension to the interactions.
The language used in the call is notably indirect. This could be due to translation or a deliberate attempt to be discreet. The formal address and use of surnames add a degree of formality to the conversation, which is typical of such high-level settings. It’s likely that the clipped nature of their language is meant to maintain secrecy.
In summary, the leaked phone call suggests a Russian strategy of careful, informal engagement with the Trump administration. It indicates a clear intention to influence events, while minimizing direct association and risk. The advisors are mindful of the need to control the narrative, maintain flexibility, and account for the potential actions of their American counterparts. This call offers a glimpse into the intricacies of international relations, the gamesmanship that often accompanies high-level diplomacy, and the lengths that nations will go to in order to advance their goals.