Congresswoman Norma Torres has written a letter to President Trump imploring him not to pardon former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández, recently convicted on drug trafficking charges. Torres argues that pardoning Hernández would undermine efforts against corruption and drug trafficking while betraying American families affected by his crimes. Hernández was accused of transforming the Honduran government into a tool of violence and corruption, thus, a pardon would send a dangerous message. Congresswoman Torres insists that Hernández serve his full sentence to uphold justice and support victims.

Read the original article here

Congresswoman Norma Torres’s bold move to send a letter to President Trump regarding Juan Orlando Hernández’s potential pardon is a clear reflection of the stakes involved. The central argument is unequivocal: Hernández, convicted of a massive drug trafficking operation that funneled hundreds of tons of cocaine into the United States, should not be pardoned. The Congresswoman’s stance, as laid out in the letter, hinges on the idea that such an act would directly undermine efforts to combat narco-trafficking and weaken international cooperation against transnational crime.

The sheer scale of Hernández’s alleged crimes, and his conviction, is the crux of the issue. We’re talking about a former leader who, according to the available information, used his position to facilitate the flow of an enormous amount of cocaine into the US. Congresswoman Torres highlights the grave implications of a pardon, arguing that it would send a dangerous message. It would essentially tell the world that those with power and money can evade justice, and the victims of their actions don’t matter. That message would embolden criminal networks and erode the hard-won progress in fighting corruption and drug-related violence.

The letter itself, and the context surrounding it, highlights a disturbing pattern. It’s difficult to avoid the feeling that such actions would be directly against the stated goals of fighting drug cartels and labeling them as terrorists. If drug cartels are indeed terrorist organizations, then Hernández, as a convicted participant, should not be set free. The contrast between this stance and the potential pardon is jarring, to say the least.

The tone surrounding the situation is one of disbelief and frustration. The suggestion that Trump might consider pardoning Hernández is met with skepticism and cynicism. The implication is that a pardon wouldn’t be based on justice or principle, but rather on personal gain or political maneuvering. This leads to the thought that Trump might not even be aware of the full extent of Hernández’s crimes, instead acting on the advice or influence of others who stand to benefit. The entire situation suggests that there is a financial benefit tied to the pardon.

The concerns extend beyond the immediate issue of Hernández. The response from other Republicans is expected to be evasive and perhaps even dismissive, mirroring a pattern of avoiding direct confrontation with any of Trump’s questionable actions. This reinforces the perception of a broader culture of corruption, where accountability is sacrificed for loyalty and political advantage.

The reaction is a sense that the administration is simply selling pardons. The cynical view is that someone is paying Trump to sign his name, and that’s all that matters. This would mean he does not care about the human cost or the larger implications of his actions. This entire situation is predictable, right down to the eventual responses.

It’s clear that Congresswoman Torres’s letter is not just a formality; it is a direct challenge to the President and his potential actions. The arguments presented, the scale of the crimes, and the potential consequences of a pardon all paint a picture of a deeply concerning situation. Her goal is to bring attention to the grave implications of a pardon and to try to prevent a miscarriage of justice that could have devastating consequences for communities, law enforcement, and the fight against organized crime.