By John Q. Hosedrinker 
California Governor Gavin Newsom and other prominent Democrats have strongly criticized a tentative Senate deal to end the government shutdown, labeling it a “surrender.” The agreement, which reportedly promises a December vote on extending Obamacare subsidies, has drawn condemnation from leaders like Newsom and Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, who view it as inadequate. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Senator Bernie Sanders have also expressed disapproval, questioning the commitment to addressing the healthcare subsidies. The deal, negotiated by Democratic senators, faces further hurdles in the House, where the outcome remains uncertain.
Read the original article here
Newsom’s immediate reaction, calling the shutdown deal “pathetic” and a “surrender,” truly resonates with the sentiment. It’s not difficult to see why. After weeks of political wrangling, inconvenience, and the overall disruption of a government shutdown, the outcome feels like a major letdown. The feeling is, what was the point of all the struggle if the end result offers little in the way of tangible progress?
The crux of the frustration centers on what’s perceived as a massive strategic misstep by Democrats. The Democrats gave up the only leverage they had for absolutely nothing in return. It’s like snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. The GOP was already shouldering the blame for the shutdown, and Democrats had a golden opportunity to push for meaningful changes, especially related to the Affordable Care Act and its crucial subsidies. Instead, the deal seems to have involved giving up ground for nothing concrete, essentially handing the Republicans a win while leaving their own base feeling betrayed.
The potential impact on ACA premium costs is a glaring example. If the enhanced premium tax credits expire, many people face a dramatic increase in healthcare costs. Someone earning $28,000 annually might see their premiums more than double, becoming a huge burden. This is precisely the kind of issue that Democrats could have fought for, and many feel they should have. The Democrats effectively gave up the midterms for… literally nothing. It seems as though their willingness to compromise ultimately backfired, setting the stage for what looks like the beginning of the end for the Democratic party.
Many feel this situation is about more than just the immediate fallout of the deal. The bigger picture involves a perceived weakness and lack of backbone within the Democratic leadership. A willingness to “preserve norms” while the other side is actively dismantling them is a recipe for disaster. The prevailing opinion is the need for a leadership overhaul, a complete clear-out, to ensure a progressive victory. Some are calling for a “clean sweep” of those who voted in favor of the deal.
The argument that Republicans will never negotiate in good faith fuels the fire. There’s a strong belief that the GOP was never going to concede on core issues, and the Democrats’ decision to concede seems incredibly naive. The fear is that the “promise of a vote” on ACA subsidies in the future is just a hollow gesture, and the Republicans will undoubtedly renege. This echoes a pattern of behavior where Democrats promise one thing and deliver something entirely different, further eroding trust and making voters feel disillusioned.
The focus is squarely on the Democrats and their perceived missteps. It’s the conviction that the deal amounts to political suicide, potentially handing the opposition a major victory. The feeling that the Democrats are complicit in the problems and are the ones solely responsible for everything that happened during the shutdown. It is no surprise that there are serious questions about the influence of money and donors on the decisions of elected officials, implying a lack of genuine commitment to the people they represent.
The impact of this deal extends beyond the immediate political ramifications. The lack of progress on critical issues like healthcare, which directly affects people’s lives, is a huge source of anger and disappointment. The consequences are far-reaching, leaving many in dire financial situations and leading to severe consequences for people’s health. The current state of political affairs seems apathetic toward the people’s needs and interests. The fact that the Democrats “caved” is infuriating to many of their supporters, who are ready to make a change.
Ultimately, Newsom’s “pathetic” assessment is a reflection of the sentiment on the ground. It is an expression of frustration, anger, and a deep-seated feeling of betrayal. The underlying concern is that the Democrats squandered a prime opportunity for progress, choosing instead to surrender ground to a politically motivated opposition. This leads to the very likely outcome of the party eating a very large chunk of the blame.