By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A promotional video from the Department of Homeland Security featuring Border Patrol commander Gregory Bovino drew criticism and comparisons to Nazi imagery due to its styling. The video, which showed Bovino in a black coat and with a close-cropped haircut, included the text “WE WILL NOT BE STOPPED” and was accompanied by a caption emphasizing the department’s mission. The imagery quickly sparked outrage online, with California Governor Gavin Newsom condemning the video as evidence of the department’s intent, and online users also noting the visual similarities. The video’s release coincided with a legal order requiring Bovino to report to a Chicago courtroom daily regarding immigration sweeps, though the order has since been paused.
Read the original article here
Gov. Newsom Joins Critics Calling DHS Border Video ‘Fascist’ After SS Look-Alike Claims Go Viral – “If you think the calls of fascism and authoritarianism are hyperbole pause and watch this video,” said Newsom while sharing the original clip from DHS, and the reaction to this incident has been, to put it mildly, explosive. The controversy began with a video released by the Department of Homeland Security, or DHS, that many observers quickly deemed unsettling, drawing comparisons to Nazi propaganda and imagery. The video, which has since gone viral, prompted a swift and largely negative response, culminating in the governor of California, Gavin Newsom, adding his voice to the chorus of condemnation.
The most striking aspect of the criticism centered on the visual elements of the DHS video. Critics pointed to specific stylistic choices, including what they saw as unsettling music, and the overall editing style. But most prominently, they focused on visual cues they felt evoked the aesthetics of Nazi Germany. Claims of individuals in the video bearing a resemblance to members of the SS, the infamous paramilitary wing of the Nazi party, further fueled the controversy. These similarities, whether intentional or not, were enough to spark outrage and accusations of fascist tendencies.
The shared concerns by the public are reflected in the reactions on social media. Many users immediately saw the video as problematic, and the references were quick to emerge. Comparisons to propaganda films of the Nazi era were common. The video’s style, some suggested, was reminiscent of the type of content promoted by the far-right. The use of certain visual motifs and editing techniques amplified these concerns.
It’s not just the aesthetics that raised eyebrows. The video’s perceived message and the way it was presented were also questioned. Some argued that the video appeared to be aimed at a specific audience, one potentially sympathetic to far-right ideologies. The video, which utilized a musical style often associated with right-wing groups, was also seen as an attempt to appeal to that specific demographic. The concerns were focused not just on the content of the video but also on its potential impact, particularly in an environment where right-wing views are easily accessible.
The response from Gov. Newsom underscores the gravity of the situation and the depth of the concern. By sharing the original DHS clip and echoing the criticism of the video, Newsom acknowledged the validity of these concerns, adding his weight to the chorus of those calling out the imagery and underlying message. His statement, “If you think the calls of fascism and authoritarianism are hyperbole pause and watch this video,” is a direct challenge to anyone who might dismiss the concerns as overblown.
The fact that the video was produced by the DHS, a government agency, only intensifies the controversy. The use of such imagery by a federal agency is seen as particularly alarming. It raises questions about the individuals responsible for creating the video, the vetting process it went through, and the overall direction of the department. This incident may also lead to questioning the influence of certain ideologies within governmental institutions.
The reactions and claims in response to the video reveal a deep sensitivity to fascist symbolism. This isn’t just about the aesthetics of the video. It’s about what those aesthetics represent: a history of violence, oppression, and the erosion of democratic values. These concerns resonate deeply in a society where the threat of authoritarianism remains a persistent concern.
The video serves as a reminder of the insidious ways in which propaganda can be disseminated. The combination of music, images, and editing can be used to manipulate perceptions and subtly promote certain ideologies. It’s a testament to the power of visual media, and the need for a vigilant public that can recognize and challenge these forms of manipulation.
The controversy also sheds light on the broader political climate. Concerns about rising extremism, political division, and the spread of misinformation have fueled this reaction. The DHS video is viewed as another indication of the challenges facing democracy. It is another example of a growing rift in American society.
Ultimately, the DHS border video incident is not just about a single video. It’s a reflection of the tensions, anxieties, and political divisions of the modern age. It’s a reminder of the vigilance that’s required to protect democratic values. The controversy serves as a call for increased awareness, critical thinking, and a willingness to confront troubling trends. The response from Gov. Newsom and other public figures is a clear signal that these concerns are taken seriously, and that the fight against extremism and authoritarianism will continue.