By Matt Underwood New prosecutor chosen in Georgia 2020 election interference case against Trump, others. This whole situation feels like a movie, doesn’t it? The saga of the Georgia election interference case, involving Donald Trump and others, has taken another turn. The news is that a new prosecutor has been chosen, and the reaction, well, it’s mixed, to say the least.
The initial reaction seems to be a deep-seated skepticism, almost resignation. There’s a prevailing sense that the system is rigged, that the powerful will always find a way to escape accountability. The fact that the new prosecutor, Pete Skandalakis, named himself to the position after leading the search isn’t exactly inspiring confidence. The concern is that this case, one of the few avenues for potential consequences for Trump, is being set up for failure. Some voters are still deeply angered. The thought is that the original prosecutor, by her own actions, may have damaged the case.
The sentiment is clear: Justice delayed is justice denied. The case has been dragging on for years, and the fear is that it will either be dismissed or that Trump will somehow evade any real repercussions. The potential for further delays, legal maneuvers, and ultimately, a lack of accountability is a major concern.
The appointment of Skandalakis has raised some serious red flags. Reports indicate that he has already decided against prosecuting a Trump fake elector, which isn’t a promising start. The general perception is that the US justice system is flawed, and that the case will fail because of prosecutorial discretionary choices, like not prosecuting.
It’s been suggested that the new prosecutor might find a way to dismiss the charges, perhaps after a “thorough review.” The potential for a “thorough review” leading to dismissal is high, and the expectation is that Trump will somehow wriggle free. The idea of the case being “ratfucked” – deliberately sabotaged – is also expressed, along with the view that it’s all part of a larger pattern where the powerful protect their own.
There’s a sense that the entire process is a waste of time and resources, and the belief that Trump will ultimately escape any real punishment. The system is seen as designed to protect the rich and powerful, and that expecting accountability is naive. The argument is that nothing will fundamentally change without systemic reform.
The perception is that Trump is untouchable, and that he will never be held accountable, even if found guilty. The fact that this is taking place in Georgia, a state with a Republican governor, adds to the gloom. The new prosecutor is said to be a Republican, which further fuels the pessimism.
There’s also an indictment of the prior prosecutor, who has been criticized for her actions. There’s an argument that any scandal, a Hail Mary impeachment, or something like it, was always going to happen. It’s suggested that the focus should be on those within the Georgian system who are taking the bait, willfully or ignorantly.
There’s a general recognition that the challenges in prosecuting Trump are significant. It is noted that the defense is well-equipped to exploit any perceived flaws in the case and that the prosecution will be made difficult. There is an expectation that Trump’s legal team will find ways to challenge any charges brought against him, and that these challenges could potentially delay the case. It is easy for them to claim he was acting in an official capacity and is immune.
The core issue appears to be a lack of faith in the justice system. The perception is that the system is broken, and that the powerful and corrupt will be able to manipulate it to their advantage. There’s a strong sentiment that any attempt to hold Trump accountable will be thwarted. The view is that there will be a “sweetheart deal”.
The overall impression is one of disappointment and disillusionment. The case seems to be headed for a less than desirable outcome.