By John Q. Hosedrinker 
AP News reports that a diamond brooch lost by Napoleon during the Battle of Waterloo sold for over 3.5 million Swiss francs at a Geneva auction. The brooch, featuring a 13-carat oval diamond, significantly exceeded its pre-sale estimate. This sale price was boosted by a “private collector,” as well as the recent theft of Napoleonic jewels at the Louvre museum in Paris. A green beryl also worn by Napoleon sold for nearly 1 million Swiss francs.
Read the original article here
Sotheby’s says a diamond brooch lost by Napoleon as his forces fled Waterloo sells for $4.4 million. That’s quite a statement, isn’t it? A piece of history, quite literally, changing hands for a staggering sum. Thinking about it, the fact that Napoleon, even in the midst of a battlefield retreat, had a diamond brooch in tow is a detail that immediately captures the imagination. One can only wonder at the circumstances, at the image of the carriage laden with finery being left behind in the chaotic scramble of defeat.
The reported price of $4.4 million is just a starting point for contemplation. It immediately raises questions about the brooch’s composition. From the photograph, the piece appears to be made up of far more than just 13 carats, which is reportedly the weight of the central diamond. The surrounding diamonds, along with any other gemstones that might be present, would likely contribute significantly to the overall value. Mine-cut diamonds, known for their depth, could easily add to the total carat weight in ways that are not immediately obvious from a top-down view. One has to wonder what the ultimate, calculated estimate is, for the total weight of the piece.
Adding to the allure is the presence of other gems, such as the large green beryl. While a stunning stone in its own right, its presence also opens up a conversation about gemology. Its pale color might have prevented it from being sold as a true emerald, but the gem adds another layer of intrigue and value. The fact that the brooch, a symbol of opulence and status, was lost in such a defining moment in history only amplifies its mystique. The context of the sale, the auction, and the people involved is a crucial element to understanding the value of this item.
It’s interesting to consider the various interpretations one can draw from the situation. The fact that Sotheby’s is the source of the information adds a layer of credibility, but even then, questions about the evidence behind the sale arise. It is easy to find yourself wanting to know the specific details, to confirm the legitimacy of this transaction. It’s a reminder of how much we rely on the word of those in positions of authority.
The discussion also inevitably brings up Napoleon himself, a figure of undeniable historical significance. While a military genius, he was also a man of excess, and the diamond brooch is a potent symbol of that. The juxtaposition of the brooch with the battlefield is striking. His military brilliance is undeniable, but his choices sometimes led to disastrous outcomes. His decision-making process is now the subject of intense scrutiny from onlookers.
This particular sale also prompts a discussion about the importance of evidence. If a renowned auction house like Sotheby’s says something sold for a specific price, what more proof is needed? The idea that one requires more evidence, even after seeing a documented sale, is a commentary on how we interact with information. Perhaps it underscores the skepticism that is now a common trait in modern life.
In the end, the sale of the diamond brooch isn’t just about the money. It’s a window into a specific moment in time, a tangible link to a pivotal historical figure, and a testament to the enduring power of history and luxury. Sotheby’s says a diamond brooch lost by Napoleon as his forces fled Waterloo sells for $4.4 million—and that, in itself, is a story worth telling.