By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A federal appeals court panel upheld the dismissal of Donald Trump’s $475 million defamation lawsuit against CNN, deeming his claims “unpersuasive” and “meritless.” The lawsuit stemmed from CNN’s use of the term “the Big Lie” to describe Trump’s claims of election fraud, a phrase the court found did not constitute a false statement of fact. The court rejected Trump’s argument, stating that the term was a subjective interpretation of his actions. This marks another legal defeat for Trump in his attempts to sue media outlets over their coverage of his claims.
Read the original article here
MTG Appears to Call Trump a “Traitor” Ahead of Epstein Vote. The political landscape is certainly becoming more… interesting. The news that MTG, or Marjorie Taylor Greene, appears to be leveling the “traitor” accusation against Donald Trump is, to put it mildly, unexpected. Given their past alignment and shared ideological ground, it’s a surprising development that’s got everyone talking.
MTG’s declaration came in response to Trump calling her a traitor, and her reaction seemed to be a definitive rejection of that label. Her counter-accusation is quite direct: a “traitor” is someone serving foreign interests, while a patriot serves the United States. This is a pointed statement, especially when considering the context of the upcoming vote on releasing the Epstein files.
The fact that this all revolves around the Epstein files, a dark subject with potential ramifications for many high-profile individuals, adds another layer of complexity. It’s a powder keg of accusations and counter-accusations, and it’s easy to see how the release of those files could be a significant turning point in the narratives. With MTG aligning herself with those seeking the files’ release, it’s a clear signal that she’s charting her own course, potentially distancing herself from Trump and his influence.
This situation presents a fascinating study in political maneuvering. It’s evident that the dynamics within the Republican party are shifting. MTG, often considered a staunch Trump ally, now finds herself in direct opposition to him. This could be interpreted in several ways: a genuine disagreement over principles, a calculated move to seize power, or perhaps even a bit of both.
One possibility is that MTG is positioning herself for a post-Trump era. Seeing the potential for a weakening of Trump’s grip on the party, she might be trying to establish herself as a leader of the “America First” movement, potentially appealing to voters disenchanted with Trump. It’s also possible that she genuinely believes Trump is acting against the interests of the country, and that the Epstein situation is a defining moment.
The comments also reflect a certain cynicism. Many people suspect opportunism, viewing this as a political calculation. They see it as a shift in allegiance rather than a sudden change of heart. There’s a widespread feeling that many figures in the Republican party are simply waiting for the right moment to distance themselves from Trump, and that MTG is among those ready to make the jump.
The discussion touches on the historical precedents, referencing Winston Churchill’s alliance with Stalin. This is a way of saying that MTG’s actions, even if motivated by self-interest, might inadvertently serve a greater good. It’s a complicated picture, and as always, the truth is likely somewhere in the middle.
There’s also a sense that the release of the Epstein files could have a significant impact. Some people wonder if the files will expose further wrongdoing. Others suspect manipulation and political theater, with the release being strategically timed and potentially containing carefully chosen information.
Regardless of the motivations, this situation underscores the ongoing transformations within American politics. The relationship between Trump and MTG has changed, and it raises a lot of questions about the future of the Republican party and the political landscape.
Overall, it seems that there’s a strong consensus that this is a turning point. It’s a reminder that political alliances are often fluid and that the pursuit of power and influence can lead to unexpected shifts. And now, the debate regarding the release of the Epstein files is now even more politically charged, with MTG’s apparent stance intensifying the discussion. The potential implications are vast, and it will be interesting to watch how this unfolds. The fact that the entire situation is now being characterized as “two traitors yelling at each other” says it all.