By John Q. Hosedrinker 
User feedback regarding video advertisements revealed several common problems. Respondents frequently reported slow loading times for both the ads themselves and the subsequent video content. Issues also included frozen or incomplete ad playback, as well as instances where the intended video failed to start after the ad concluded. Additionally, complaints about excessively loud audio levels in the ads were prevalent.
Read the original article here
Sen. Mark Kelly: ‘No’ I wouldn’t have followed the order to carry out second strike on suspected drug vessel. This is a pretty clear statement, and it speaks volumes about his character and his understanding of military ethics and the law. It’s hard to imagine a scenario where anyone with a conscience, let alone someone with Senator Kelly’s background, would willingly participate in what appears to be a clear-cut case of murder.
The focus on the second strike is warranted because the context makes it so. After the initial strike, if there were survivors, a second strike would be a blatant violation of the laws of war. It’s simple: killing unarmed people, even if they were suspected of wrongdoing, is illegal. It’s basic military training. Basic knowledge everyone learns in their first year. If people in the chain of command issued and carried out such orders, they deserve to be held accountable. And it is refreshing to see a leader, especially one with combat experience, take a clear stance.
The fact that the first strike might have been illegal, too, is a very important point. The mission, assuming it was to interdict drugs, was arguably accomplished. Any further action becomes questionable, and, depending on the specifics, possibly criminal. The lack of due process for those on the vessel, regardless of their alleged activities, is a serious concern. It’s a sad reality that the first strike might not even be mentioned, or, if mentioned, is spun to be lawful.
The concern that the administration might be using the military and the criminal justice system in an abusive way, even to the point of dictatorship, cannot be ignored. The context of this order is very relevant. It seems as though, this administration, is doing everything it can to abuse the law. It’s difficult to defend against orders that appear so obviously illegal, which might further erode international trust and potentially jeopardize the safety of allied armed forces.
The potential for political ramifications is real, especially with the possibility of a recall to active duty and a court-martial. But this is the kind of stance that defines leadership and integrity. Even though this isn’t a controversial take, the stakes are real. This situation is further complicated by the ongoing political climate and the potential for a culture of fear within the military, where people might hesitate to question illegal orders.
It’s important to note the various conversations that are circulating about these incidents. This includes the conversations amongst podcasts where ex-Special Forces guys or ex-military are actively involved. It’s the kind of honest conversation we need to have. The underlying message is clear: uphold the law, respect human life, and stand up for what’s right, even when it’s difficult.