By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In Tennessee, Larry Bushart Jr. was arrested and held on a $2 million bail for a social media post that directly quoted Donald Trump in reference to a school shooting, sparking controversy. Sheriff Nick Weems, a public mourner of Charlie Kirk, claimed the post caused “mass hysteria” and utilized a law intended to prevent school shootings to justify the arrest. Bodycam footage and public records directly contradicted Weems’s claims, revealing that the sheriff lied to the public and was motivated by a personal vendetta. Bushart’s arrest resulted in him missing the birth of his grandchild and losing his job, leading to a lawsuit against the sheriff.
Read the original article here
The case of the man arrested for quoting Donald Trump, a situation involving a Charlie Kirk fan who also happens to be a sheriff, paints a disturbing picture of how easily free speech can be curtailed. This 61-year-old man, identified as Bushart, was jailed for a staggering five weeks. The consequences were severe, including the loss of his job. Given his age, the job market presents an uphill battle for re-employment, compounding the hardship. His “crime”? Simply quoting Donald Trump on Facebook. Specifically, he shared a photo of the former president accompanied by the quote, “We have to get over it,” referencing Trump’s response to a school shooting in Perry, Iowa, in 2024. The implications are deeply concerning.
The arresting officer, Sheriff Weems, appears to be a fervent supporter of Charlie Kirk. Weems seemed to insist that Bushart could have avoided arrest simply by deleting the meme that he found objectionable. The Sheriff’s account of events has been directly challenged by evidence. Body cam footage reveals discrepancies between his public statements and the reality of the situation. Initially, Sheriff Weems claimed that the police “coordinated” with Bushart prior to the arrest, to allow him to delete the post, but the footage proved that Weems had lied.
Sheriff Weems tried to justify the arrest by claiming that the post caused community fear about a local shooting. However, evidence directly contradicts this claim, including no comments from the people who had viewed the post suggesting that it was a threat to the local high school. The sheriff later admitted that the meme was not about Perry County High School, yet he still sought Bushart’s arrest, purportedly to quell community fears. This looks very much like an attempt to censor free speech, using the guise of community safety.
The arrest and subsequent jailing have sparked outrage, and rightly so. Many feel that this is a blatant violation of the First Amendment, an act of intimidation designed to silence dissenting voices. One cannot help but feel uneasy when witnessing such actions. The incident reflects a worrying trend, where individuals are penalized for expressing opinions or sharing quotes that someone in authority deems objectionable. There’s a widespread fear that such actions are an indication of a future where open dialogue is stifled.
The financial and personal ramifications for Bushart are devastating. The $2 million bail is also a clear indication of how people are criminalized for their beliefs. He faced financial ruin, including potential missed bills, and the possible loss of his home. And also, he missed the birth of his grandchild. The whole situation is deeply unfair and goes against the fundamental principles of a democratic society.
Many observers see this case as a consequence of political division and the increasing polarization of American society. They fear that this is the result of unchecked power and political agendas. The incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of protecting free speech and ensuring that those in positions of authority do not abuse their power to suppress dissent. This incident serves as a crucial case to review the importance of guarding against censorship and standing up for the constitutional rights of all citizens.