By John Q. Hosedrinker 
New York City mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani is showing his support for striking Starbucks baristas by urging people not to patronize the chain. He stated that he would not be buying Starbucks while workers remain on strike, which has been organized amid stalled contract negotiations. This action comes after the company announced restructuring and the closure of hundreds of stores, leading to the union organizing its fourth strike since 2023. This move by Mamdani, a known ally of labor, is an early indication of how he may use his position as mayor.
Read the original article here
Zohran Mamdani’s call for a boycott of Starbucks during the ongoing strike is generating a lot of buzz, and it’s easy to see why. The core of this message is straightforward: stand with the workers. As the child of a union member, the importance of not crossing a picket line is deeply ingrained, and that principle resonates strongly here. Mamdani, by embracing this fundamental tenet of union solidarity, is signaling a clear commitment to supporting workers’ rights. It’s refreshing to see a political figure openly acknowledging and backing the struggles of those fighting for fair contracts.
The call itself isn’t a complex one. The message is to avoid Starbucks while baristas are on strike, highlighting that it’s a manageable action that can make a difference. It’s not about giving up coffee entirely, nor is it about radical activism. It’s a simple act of support: choosing an alternative to Starbucks while the workers are on strike. This approach emphasizes that supporting workers’ rights doesn’t always demand huge sacrifices; sometimes, small changes in consumer habits can be surprisingly impactful.
Many people find the call to boycott an easy one to answer. Some have already been avoiding Starbucks for various reasons, whether it’s concerns about union-busting tactics, high prices, or the quality of the coffee itself. The strike provides another strong reason to continue that boycott. For many, the boycott isn’t about giving up something they love; it’s about making a conscious choice to support workers’ rights over their craving for a particular brand.
The general sentiment on display is a deep-seated belief in the power of solidarity, that is an encouragement to support the workers. Many find it easy to support local coffee shops, which strengthens local economies while also supporting the workers’ rights movement. Furthermore, the focus isn’t just on boycotting Starbucks, but on understanding why the strike is happening. It’s about recognizing the unfair labor practices and taking a stand against them.
It’s also worth noting the diverse range of perspectives on this issue. Some express a general dislike of politicians wading into business affairs, while others strongly support Mamdani’s actions. The historical context of political leaders supporting labor movements shouldn’t be overlooked. While not every political leader embraces this, there’s a recognized precedent for elected officials to side with the people, especially when it comes to workers’ rights.
The conversation around this boycott has also highlighted the importance of clear communication about what a boycott actually means. It’s not just about expressing personal preference; it’s about actively stopping consumption to create financial pressure on the company. For people who have never been Starbucks customers, the boycott itself is a non-issue. For the rest, every purchase made elsewhere while the strike is active contributes to the success of the boycott, and ultimately to the success of the striking workers.
The overall tone is one of enthusiastic support. Mamdani’s stance is seen by many as a genuine example of an elected official standing with the people, especially the working class. The boycott is not an end in itself; it’s a tactic designed to put pressure on Starbucks to negotiate a fair contract. It’s about the bigger picture: recognizing the importance of worker rights and supporting those who fight for them. It’s a call to action that resonates with those who believe in a fair and just society.