By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The recent publication of a phone transcript between Donald Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, and Vladimir Putin’s aide, Yuri Ushakov, offers a revealing look into modern US diplomacy. The transcript demonstrates a shift towards prioritizing flattery and ego-stroking of Donald Trump as the primary diplomatic strategy. Witkoff advised Ushakov on how to garner Trump’s favor, potentially influencing deal outcomes in Russia’s benefit. The leaked call raises concerns as it highlights a negotiation style more akin to autocratic leadership than traditional democratic processes, ultimately suggesting a deviation from long-term US interests.
Read the original article here
Leaked recordings reveal a deeply troubling reality – the possibility that former President Trump has been, and potentially still is, under the influence of Vladimir Putin. The core of the issue, as evidenced by these leaks, is the extent of Trump’s apparent susceptibility to manipulation and the potential for Putin to exploit this vulnerability. It’s not about making him a puppet; it appears he already *is* one. The evidence suggests a consistent pattern of behavior that strongly indicates Putin’s control.
The essence of the matter is the existence of the transcript between Trump’s special envoy and Putin’s aide. The discussions, as revealed, paint a picture of strategic maneuvering, with Trump’s envoy offering advice on how to use flattery to influence Trump’s decisions. The envoy is literally coaching Putin’s aide on how to leverage the President’s ego to get what they want. This reveals a chilling power dynamic. It highlights a potential situation where critical decisions about national security and international relations could be influenced not by the merits of the arguments, but by how well those arguments can be wrapped in praise.
One must examine the context. The recording indicates a desire to influence the president’s decisions. This is not normal behavior in the realm of international diplomacy. The suggestion of crafting a peace proposal that closely mirrored Russian demands further underscores this concern. This isn’t just about diplomacy; it’s about a potential subversion of the United States’ interests. It appears that a high-ranking Trump administration official was actively assisting an adversary in manipulating the President for their benefit, at the expense of US and allied interests.
Trump’s affinity for authoritarian leaders is another point. It’s hard to ignore his admiration for Putin, which can be interpreted as a sign of respect and trust. The leaked recordings confirm this pattern of behavior, which aligns with the theory of Putin’s influence over Trump.
It is worth noting that the evidence available provides a complete picture of the situation. Some might suggest that the discussions between envoys represent standard diplomatic maneuvering, but the context and content of these conversations go far beyond that. The fact that Trump’s aide seemed more concerned with flattering the President than with the actual content of the proposal is significant. It reveals a level of control that can only be described as puppeteering.
The leaks, while shocking, should not be surprising to those who have been paying attention. It is not about “making” Trump a puppet but rather about the undeniable reality that he has already been operating under Putin’s influence for years. The evidence suggests a long-standing relationship of manipulation and dependency.
The question that remains is what can be done. The damage has already been done, but the revelations force us to confront the possibility that the foundations of American democracy are at risk. It’s not a question of “if” but of “how” Putin has leveraged his influence over Trump. This isn’t a simple matter of political disagreements; it’s a matter of national security.
The recordings are a stark reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in government. It reveals that the pursuit of personal ambition and political gain can undermine the very fabric of democracy. There are indications that the process of influence is already in place. It’s difficult to say how much control Putin has, but there is no doubt that his level of involvement is alarming.
This is not a new issue. The pattern of behavior has been there for years. The leaked recordings only add more fuel to an already-burning fire. It’s not “making” anymore; it’s an established fact. The evidence suggests Trump has been a puppet, and the implications of this cannot be ignored.