By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a recent podcast interview, Joe Rogan criticized Donald Trump’s shifting stance on the Epstein files and admitted to briefly considering the purchase of Epstein’s infamous island. Rogan mocked Trump’s sudden call for the release of the files after previously dismissing the controversy as a hoax, and also revealed he explored buying Little Saint James. Trump’s involvement in the Epstein case has been scrutinized, especially after he reversed course and directed the Justice Department and FBI to investigate Epstein’s connections to other individuals. Rogan has previously endorsed Trump but has also expressed criticism of his actions in the past.
Read the original article here
Joe Rogan mocks Trump over Epstein files. ‘What is going on?’ is the crux of a pretty interesting situation, isn’t it? It seems a lot of people are reacting with a mixture of disbelief and, let’s be frank, a hefty dose of “I told you so.” The general sentiment is that Rogan, a prominent figure with a massive platform, is feigning surprise at the revelations within the Epstein files. Many are pointing out that his past actions, specifically his past endorsements, make his current reaction appear disingenuous. The consensus seems to be that he should have been more critical earlier, rather than waiting for the files to surface before expressing any reservations.
The accusations leveled against Rogan are pretty clear. He’s being accused of being a “chief propagandist” and an “enabler.” The sentiment is that he contributed to Trump’s rise to power, and now, he’s playing the role of someone shocked by the very information that was readily available all along. It’s hard to ignore the perception that he’s trying to distance himself from the fallout now that public opinion seems to be shifting. The comments suggest that his attempts to appear surprised or critical are too little, too late. There’s a strong undercurrent of resentment towards him, with many expressing that they’ve lost respect for him.
It’s also interesting to consider the accusations of toxic masculinity and the idea that Rogan, and by extension, Trump, are not the kind of men to be looked up to. This seems to be at the heart of the criticism of Rogan. The argument is that his endorsement of Trump, and perhaps his general worldview, catered to a specific type of audience – one that values a certain type of masculinity, which is now seen as flawed. The mockery of Rogan is also seen to be tied to his past behavior. It’s the idea that he endorsed Trump with full knowledge of who Trump was, and now, he’s expressing surprise at the consequences. This is a common theme that seems to be going around.
The criticism goes beyond just Rogan’s actions. There’s a wider commentary on the political climate and the roles that influencers play. The comments highlight how political discourse is sometimes handled, where influencers appear to be prioritizing their own interests, rather than the interests of their audience. This is where you see the accusations of “mindless money hungry fuck,” and “fake fuck” coming into play. This also shows the frustrations around the situation.
There’s also a clear feeling that Rogan is trying to get ahead of the curve, sensing a shift in public sentiment and attempting to distance himself from Trump to protect his own brand. The comments on his subreddit banning political posts only reinforce this sentiment. They seem to suggest that he’s trying to have it both ways, reaping the rewards of his past endorsements while simultaneously trying to avoid being associated with the negative consequences. It is a very opportunistic move, according to the commentators.
The core question that seems to be underlying all of this is: “Are you that stupid?” It’s a rhetorical question that many are asking, implying that Rogan is either incredibly naive or, worse, deliberately playing dumb for his audience. The general sense is that the information about Trump was out there. He knew who he was endorsing. This creates a disconnect between his past actions and his present reaction. It highlights what many people see as hypocrisy and a lack of accountability.
In addition, the commentary doesn’t just focus on Rogan’s actions. It digs into the implications of the Epstein files themselves. There’s a general sense of disgust and disbelief at the revelations within the files, specifically mentioning Trump’s involvement in sex trafficking and other illegal activities. And the commentary highlights the bigger picture, with the implication that the files may be showing how Trump has been tied to Russian money, and that may be why he does not want those files released. It all ties back into what the commentators see as the core of the problem.
All in all, the reactions to Joe Rogan’s comments on the Epstein files reflect a broader dissatisfaction with his past actions, a questioning of his motivations, and a general distrust of figures who many feel are opportunistic influencers. It’s a harsh assessment, but one that seems to reflect the sentiment of a vocal segment of the population. The “What is going on?” question is clearly rhetorical, with the underlying answer being “We know what’s going on, and you, Joe Rogan, should have known too.”