By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a recent essay published in *The New Yorker*, John F. Kennedy’s granddaughter, Tatiana Schlossberg, disclosed her terminal cancer diagnosis at the age of 34, revealing she was diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia. Schlossberg, an environmental journalist, detailed her experiences with chemotherapy, stem cell transplants, and clinical trials, during which her doctor estimated she might have about a year to live. She also expressed criticism of policies supported by her cousin, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., impacting cancer research. The essay, published on the anniversary of her grandfather’s assassination, delves into her fears and sadness surrounding her diagnosis.
Read the original article here
JFK’s granddaughter reveals terminal cancer diagnosis, criticizing cousin RFK Jr. is a profoundly saddening situation. The fact that at such a young age, only 34 years old, she’s facing this reality and leaving behind two children is heartbreaking. It’s a stark reminder of life’s fragility and the cruel randomness of illness. The sense of a family “curse” seems to permeate the discussions, though the origins of such a notion are complex and open to interpretation.
Her essay included a pointed critique of her cousin, RFK Jr., particularly his stance on mRNA vaccine research. Specifically, she noted his alleged actions in diverting funds from research into mRNA vaccines, a technology that holds potential in combating certain cancers. This is where the narrative shifts from personal tragedy to a more pointed commentary on her cousin’s actions. The implication is that his choices have, at least indirectly, impacted the progress of cancer research, potentially hindering treatments that could have benefited her.
The depth of the family’s division on RFK Jr. appears significant, with numerous other family members also voicing criticism. His actions seem to stand in stark contrast to the values that many believe the Kennedy family traditionally upheld, a fight for progress and the welfare of others. It appears that her brother’s decision to run for a senate seat might be motivated in part to undermine RFK Jr.’s harmful rhetoric.
The intensity of feeling regarding RFK Jr.’s actions is palpable. Some people find it incredibly frustrating and unfair that he is the one who appears to thrive despite some of the tragedies and illnesses that have plagued the family. The suggestion that he is somehow “outliving” the family and is also seemingly responsible for the destruction of hope for more Americans. The disappointment and anger over his choices are obvious.
The personal tragedy felt by this diagnosis cannot be overstated. Comments about losing a loved one to cancer are shared, the experiences of others dealing with cancer and other terrible diseases in their own families.
The criticisms levied against RFK Jr. extend beyond his impact on cancer research. Some believe his actions are doing harm to the country. The sentiment is that he is actively working against the values that were important to the family, especially his father and his grandfather, and that his influence is detrimental.
The narrative also raises questions about whether or not this is a “curse” or simply the unfortunate confluence of risks and consequences within a high-profile family. Regardless, it is a devastating situation for her and her loved ones.