By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Amidst a vote to compel the full release of FBI files related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett expressed skepticism towards the recent shifts in stance by former President Donald Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson. Initially dismissing the investigation as a “hoax,” Trump now supports the file’s release, prompting Johnson to follow suit, a move Crockett believes is insincere. Crockett suggests that Trump and Republicans aim to stall the release, potentially through the Senate or by using ongoing investigations as a legal justification, despite their public pronouncements. Furthermore, concerns exist, including from Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, that Trump’s call to investigate others involved in the Epstein case may further delay or obstruct the file’s release.
Read the original article here
She’s right, plain and simple. The sentiment that Jasmine Crockett, and many others, are voicing about the potential release of the Epstein files is crystal clear: they aren’t buying it. The sudden shift in Trump and Republican attitudes towards releasing these files, after a prolonged period of resistance, raises immediate suspicions. The prevailing belief is that this newfound support is a smokescreen, a strategic maneuver designed not to reveal the truth but to bury it, or at least to control the narrative surrounding it.
The most common concern centers on the integrity of the files themselves. The fear is that the documents will be heavily redacted, altered, or even completely fabricated to shield certain individuals, particularly those with close ties to Trump and the Republican party. The suggestion is that the focus will shift, with the files being used to target Democrats while simultaneously concealing any potentially damaging information about Republicans. The fact that Trump could have released these documents at any point, and chose not to, fuels this skepticism.
The concern extends to the potential for legal maneuvers to delay or obstruct the release. The most often mentioned tactic is the invocation of ongoing investigations, providing a convenient justification for withholding or limiting the released information. This mirrors a long-standing pattern of delay, deflection, and manipulation that has become a hallmark of this political playbook. The perception is that the shutdown, and any subsequent actions, offered a window of opportunity to scrutinize and sanitize the files before any potential release, minimizing any negative consequences for those implicated.
One point of consensus among those skeptical of the files’ release is the understanding that the files themselves do not hold all of the information. Many believe that some content has already been concealed to make certain individuals seem “clean.” This reinforces the belief that the release, even if it happens, will be far from complete. The mention of “flagging” and redacting of information related to Trump specifically strengthens the sentiment that his name, and potentially those of his associates, have been scrubbed from the files.
The role of the media in this context also generates critical discussion. There is a sense of frustration that the media is not sufficiently highlighting the power that Trump has to authorize the release of the unredacted files, emphasizing the fact that the call for their release has not come from the former President. The argument is that this lack of pressure, combined with the focus on Trump’s support for the release, allows the narrative to be controlled, and potentially obscures the reality of what may or may not be released.
The timing of this purported shift is significant. The call for the release has coincided with a time when Trump’s political standing is under scrutiny, and he is facing ongoing legal challenges. This has led to the speculation that the release is being framed to offer a defense against these investigations. The shift also coincides with the lead up to midterm elections. This opens the question as to whether a release will occur prior to these elections, and whether any release would have a meaningful impact.
In essence, the prevailing attitude is one of distrust and skepticism. The sudden change of heart by Trump and the Republicans is seen not as a genuine embrace of transparency but as a cynical attempt to control the narrative and protect their interests. The anticipation is that, despite the public pronouncements, the release of the Epstein files will ultimately be a carefully managed affair, designed to minimize damage and potentially even turn the situation to their advantage. The words of Jasmine Crockett, and the chorus of agreement, reflect a deep-seated belief that they are being played, and that the truth about the Epstein files will remain buried.