By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Italy’s parliament recently passed a law introducing femicide as a crime, punishable by life in prison. This new legislation, backed by the government, seeks to address the rising violence against women, including measures against stalking and revenge porn, and passed with bipartisan support. The law was prompted by numerous cases of violence and murders targeting women, notably the 2023 killing of a university student that fueled public outcry. While welcomed, the opposition emphasized the need to address economic and cultural factors alongside criminal justice reforms.
Read the original article here
Italy now recognizes the crime of femicide and punishes it with life in prison. This is a significant step, and it sparks a lot of thoughts. On the surface, the idea of adding “femicide” to the books seems straightforward. Isn’t murder already illegal? Yes, it is. But the crucial distinction here is that femicide specifically targets murders motivated by gender. It’s not just that a woman was killed; it’s that she was killed *because* she was a woman. This recognition extends to stronger measures against gender-based crimes like stalking and revenge porn, which are often precursors to the most severe acts of violence.
One of the interesting aspects is the political backing. It’s a bit surprising to see this initiative supported, even by conservative parties, but considering the other measures included – like tackling stalking and revenge porn – it suggests a broader aim to address gender-based violence. Many have long felt these actions are overdue, especially in light of the history of femicide, stalking, and the non-consensual sharing of intimate images. The hope is that this will drive other countries to follow suit.
However, there’s a lot of debate about the specifics and potential implications. Some question how exactly you prove that a murder was committed because of a person’s gender. It’s a valid point. There’s a crucial distinction between any murder and a murder where gender is the *motive*. Also, some raise concerns about equity. Is a woman’s life inherently more valuable, legally speaking? This leads to a cascade of questions: is murdering a woman a “higher” crime than murdering a man? Is murdering a spouse a different crime based on the gender of the victim or the perpetrator? These are challenging questions.
There’s the worry that this could be seen as discriminatory. Some feel that creating a special legal category for femicide could unintentionally diminish the value of a man’s life. The argument is, should we not aim for a legal framework where all victims of murder are equally valued, regardless of their gender? The fear here is that such a system will foster resentment and division, creating an “us vs. them” mentality, and potentially backfiring. It’s also interesting to consider how this might impact the legal landscape regarding women’s rights.
Another important point raised, is whether this will actually deter crime. Some argue that someone in a fit of rage isn’t likely to pause and consider the specific legal terminology. There’s also the concern that this change could lead to increased resentment and potentially even fuel existing biases. There’s also the fact that, in some places where similar laws have been implemented, such as Mexico and Brazil, the actual numbers of femicides haven’t decreased, but have actually gone up.
From another angle, it’s worth examining what this means practically. Will the new law apply only to cases where a woman is killed? Or will it include cases where a female kills another female? It could create a grey area of laws. Is the motive relevant here? The core of the matter is about targeting a person because they are a woman, and that constitutes a hate crime. It’s the intent that matters.
Ultimately, this is about recognizing that women are disproportionately targeted for violence simply because they are women. It’s about acknowledging that hate crimes are different from other types of murder. There are aggravating circumstances, such as hate crimes, that push for stricter punishment. Just as theft is punished more severely when it involves a breach of trust, or crimes against children and the mentally disabled receive harsher penalties, so should a murder motivated by misogyny. This legal change is not about devaluing the lives of men; it’s about making a clear statement that violence against women based on their gender will not be tolerated. Italy is not alone in this; Mexico has had this type of law for years. It is more about curbing a string of attacks specifically targeted to women.