By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Italy’s parliament has passed a law introducing femicide into criminal law, mandating life imprisonment for the crime, coinciding with the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women. The law, supported by both the center-right government and center-left opposition, aims to address a surge in violence targeting women and includes enhanced measures against gender-based crimes. Public outcry over high-profile cases, such as the murder of Giulia Cecchettin, spurred the law’s passage, although opposition parties emphasize the need to address economic and cultural issues. The current debate now focuses on including sexual and emotional education in schools as a method of prevention, despite a government-proposed ban on the subject.
Read the original article here
Italy now recognizes the crime of femicide and punishes it with life in prison. This is a significant step, and it sparks a lot of thoughts and questions. The core of this new law is the recognition of femicide, which isn’t just about the act of killing a woman, but rather, the act of killing a woman *because* she is a woman. It’s about the motive, the specific targeting of someone based on their gender. This distinction is crucial and sets this apart from general murder laws, although both are horrific. The penalty of life in prison sends a strong message.
The idea behind this law is similar to how hate crimes work. If someone is murdered because of their race, religion, or sexual orientation, it’s considered a hate crime, and the penalties are often more severe. Femicide operates on a similar principle: it recognizes that when a woman is killed specifically for being a woman, it’s a crime driven by a specific prejudice and should be addressed accordingly. It’s a way of acknowledging the systemic targeting of women and the fact that they are disproportionately victims of such violence.
This prompts questions about how it differs from regular murder, and why the distinction matters. Regular murder laws already exist, but femicide specifically addresses the motivation behind the killing. It’s not just about the act itself, but the underlying reason—the misogyny, the hatred, the belief that a woman’s life is less valuable. This is the essence of why this is important: the targeted nature of the crime, and the intent behind it.
The focus on femicide also leads to discussions around why there isn’t an equivalent law for men, something that is termed “malicide”. The argument here is that women are disproportionately targeted for killing simply because they are women. It’s not a question of equality; it is a recognition of a particular and systemic form of violence. While men are also victims of violence, the patterns and motivations behind the violence against women are often distinct. This is about acknowledging the specific context and motivations behind these acts.
One common thread in these discussions is the idea of motive. If the intent is to kill a woman because she is a woman, then it’s femicide. If the motivation stems from another source—a car accident, a business dispute—then it would fall under general murder. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the “why” behind the crime and how it informs the severity of the act.
The implementation of such a law brings forth certain legal and societal considerations. One aspect is the potential impact on inmate housing costs, and the way the law might be interpreted by the courts. The law’s specificity also presents a challenge, with the question of whether this law might run afoul of Italy’s constitution, which prohibits laws that discriminate based on gender.
There’s debate around whether the law is truly driven by a genuine concern for women’s safety, or if it is a political maneuver by Italy’s ruling party. And of course, there are questions around the definition of who this law protects, and whether it extends to transgender women.
The overall context reveals how discussions surrounding this law bring up various perspectives. Some view it as a necessary step to address a specific form of violence. Others see it as a form of discrimination, questioning why such a law is necessary in the first place. Some, however, take issue with how this law is implemented, or the real intent behind the law.