By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Iran’s Foreign Minister stated that Tehran is open to restarting nuclear talks with the US, but only if conducted with “dignity and respect.” He emphasized that diplomacy is the only viable solution, revealing intermediaries have approached Iran to reopen negotiations. Araghchi maintains that Iran has emerged stronger from the recent attacks on its nuclear sites and will not relinquish its right to enrich uranium domestically. Though a previous agreement for a consortium with American involvement for enrichment collapsed, it could potentially be revived, but Iran is still waiting for more concrete offers from Washington.
Read the original article here
Iran says it could rejoin US nuclear talks if treated with ‘dignity and respect’, a statement that’s really got the world’s attention. Now, it’s pretty clear where this is coming from, and it’s not exactly a mystery: Iran’s facing a severe drought, a real crisis. It’s a tough situation, and suddenly, talk of re-engaging in nuclear talks emerges. Could these two things be related? Let’s just say it’s not hard to connect the dots and imagine they might be looking for some kind of assistance.
It’s easy to feel for the people of Iran, the ones suffering the consequences of a failing system, the ones who aren’t part of the government and don’t necessarily support its actions. However, the context of Iran’s actions is important. The question is, can they really expect to be treated with dignity and respect after the support Iran has given to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine? What about the support of terrorist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah? It’s a big ask, considering the implications of their actions.
If Iran really wants a favorable outcome, a change in their approach is absolutely necessary. Some say that perhaps a change is needed from within, for the Iranian people, before expecting any kind of favorable response from the US. One suggestion, albeit a cynical one, is that the currency of diplomacy might just be, well, cash, if the Trump era is to be revisited. But realistically, the world isn’t so simple. There’s a lot more to it than just that.
Another thing to consider is, why would Iran expect special treatment? The US itself doesn’t always treat its own citizens with dignity and respect. The current political climate in the US is hardly conducive to diplomacy based on those principles. Considering the domestic issues the US faces, it’s hard to see how they can offer such things abroad. In essence, it’s tough to imagine a scenario where Iran gets what it wants, under the current circumstances.
The history matters too. Considering decades of chanting “Death to America,” it’s going to take more than a plea to change the dynamics. Some are throwing out a more outlandish scenario: give up the nukes, and get some bottled water. That’s a deal that probably won’t be made. Iran needs to understand its place in the world. Its current status means a position of low leverage.
There’s the simple reality of the US’s position, too. The current US stance is a resounding “No.” It’s hard to imagine anyone in the US government treating Iran with dignity and respect. If that’s what Iran is looking for, then the outlook isn’t good. The timing is also suspicious, with the water crisis. It seems that they have a good incentive to make some kind of concessions now. The only real response to Iran’s approach is mockery. They will be waiting for a while for something to happen.
The lack of respect towards women and any dissenting voices in the country also comes up in the discussion, questioning if Iran is really able to ask for respect, when they are not offering it themselves. What about the human rights of Iranian women? Perhaps a shift in domestic policy would be a good start. Then again, the tone has changed suddenly.
The issue might also be a power play from the Supreme Leader. The corrupt elements within the IRGC are getting their due. Maybe the reality of the situation, the severity of the water crisis, is finally sinking in at the highest levels. Then there is the question of how many gold-plated jets are they willing to offer? The answer might be none. And, of course, the ever-present question: when will they face the same consequences for their actions?
On the other hand, the statement can be seen as a clever move. It gives Iran a strategic advantage. They can play the victim card, knowing the US government is unlikely to respond favorably. This might give them the freedom to continue operating as they please. And of course, the comments about the US government are not going away. It is not clear that the US could even treat itself with “dignity and respect” at the moment.
Finally, there’s the long game, that a non-MAGA administration is needed before any real progress can be made. The current environment makes it impossible. Any hope for change will have to wait for the next time things are different.