By John Q. Hosedrinker Beneath Beit Hanun, the IDF discovered a vast underground Hamas complex, a clandestine city used for terror operations. This network included thousands of structures, serving as weapons storage, command centers, and operational bases for armed terrorists. Shockingly, some of these facilities were located within an elementary school and connected by tunnels running under civilian residences, highlighting Hamas’s exploitation of the civilian population. This discovery further reveals the group’s tactics.
Read the original article here
IDF Uncovers Massive Underground Hamas Terror City Under Gaza’s Beit Hanun
The discovery of a massive underground Hamas complex beneath Gaza’s Beit Hanun is a stark reminder of the intricate and disturbing reality on the ground. The very term “terror city” is jarring, conjuring images of something out of a science fiction movie, yet the scale and sophistication of this network are undeniably concerning. It’s easy to see how Hamas, knowing their vulnerability above ground, would dedicate significant resources to create an underground haven, seemingly prioritizing their own protection while disregarding the safety of the civilian population above. The reported length of over seven kilometers and a depth of approximately 25 meters, along with around 80 living quarters, speaks volumes about the ambition and resources poured into this undertaking. The fact that the network appears to run beneath sensitive civilian infrastructure, including a UNRWA compound, schools, and mosques, is truly appalling and highlights Hamas’s disregard for international law and human life.
This underground network reportedly held control rooms used by senior Hamas commanders, weapon storage, and living quarters. It’s difficult to estimate the full cost, but the resources involved must have been substantial. The existence of such a complex raises questions about how it could have remained undetected for so long, and why its existence wasn’t fully understood or addressed during previous operations. The need for a political solution to the conflict is clear, as the cycle of violence only exacerbates the suffering of everyone involved.
The use of terms like “terror city” can sometimes feel sensationalist, but the evidence of a large-scale, fortified underground complex is undeniable. Comparing it to trench warfare from World War I or to the Viet Cong’s use of tunnels offers a relevant historical perspective. There’s a parallel here to cancer – the way Hamas operates and its goals echo the way the disease spreads, grows, and attacks. It’s a stark comparison, but it highlights the destructive nature of Hamas’s ideology and actions.
The discovery also brings to the forefront the long-standing question of international aid and its utilization within Gaza. If indeed Hamas has been in control of the government since 2007, it’s fair to ask where billions of dollars in international aid have been channeled. Resources that could have been used to build infrastructure, improve living conditions, and foster economic opportunities seem to have been diverted into military projects like this underground city. Reports of the complex’s construction, while potentially lacking solid evidence, raise questions about how this was funded. The low average family income and high unemployment rates in Gaza, before the current war, only underscore the dire economic situation the population faces.
Analyzing the construction of the tunnels, we can explore how they might have been created over time. With a basic understanding of engineering, it’s possible to imagine how a small team of people could construct a tunnel over a period of time. Using the Viet Cong as an example, the IDF might be comparing Hamas to the way the Viet Cong designed underground tunnels. The costs would depend on the ground conditions and how much of it was re-using historical tunnels. The creation of such a complex requires a dedicated workforce and a consistent supply of materials, implying a significant diversion of resources.
The issue of transparency and access to the site remains paramount. If, as some have noted, access to the complex is restricted, it feeds doubts and reinforces the perception of a lack of impartiality. This underscores the need for independent verification and reporting. Regardless of the label, this underground network represents a significant strategic asset for Hamas. The IDF’s claim of finding a “terror city” deserves scrutiny, but the discovery of a vast underground network is undeniable, and the implications of this finding should be examined without bias, prioritizing the truth.