By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a Friday lunch period, a high school student in McMinnville was arrested by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). School officials confirmed the incident, noting students witnessed the event and that they are verifying information and communicating with local partners. The family of the arrested 17-year-old claims he is a U.S. citizen, and ICE has not yet commented on the arrest. This incident follows a rise in immigration enforcement activity in Oregon, though arrests of minors are uncommon.
Read the original article here
ICE arrests McMinnville High School student, a U.S. citizen, during Friday lunch period. This is the core of the matter, and it immediately sets off alarms. The fact that a U.S. citizen was targeted and apprehended during a school day is, frankly, appalling. It echoes a recent incident in Rhode Island, where ICE detained a high school intern, who was also a U.S. citizen, right in front of the judge he was working for. The similarities are striking and point to a pattern of behavior that’s deeply troubling.
This whole situation raises serious questions about ICE’s protocols and methods. There seems to be a real lack of due diligence. How can they mistakenly target a U.S. citizen? Don’t they run basic checks before launching these operations? It’s not about randomly picking people off the street, or as the information puts it, “who you *think* someone might be.” This isn’t how law enforcement, or anyone, should operate. The very idea that a federal agency can detain a citizen with such apparent disregard for their rights is chilling.
The lack of transparency around this incident is also concerning. The article mentions a statement from the superintendent, but it’s crucial to know the circumstances surrounding ICE’s presence on school grounds. Did the school allow them in, or did they access the student another way? The article indicates that they were apprehended off school grounds. Either way, the fundamental question remains: Why was this student targeted? The article notes that ICE has declined to comment on why they targeted the student.
The implications of these actions go far beyond this one case. It speaks to a larger issue of trust in the government and the protection of citizens’ rights. The fact that a student could be targeted simply because of their appearance, or potentially, based on erroneous information, is a violation of basic human rights. The questions proposed in the document, like “Do you trust the federal government to protect you?” and “Do you believe that this administration is specifically targeting groups of people?” resonate profoundly in this context.
The potential for abuse is immense. The assertion that ICE “officers” receive bonuses per arrest, regardless of conviction, is especially damning. It incentivizes the targeting of easy targets, regardless of their actual status. This is not about enforcing immigration laws; it’s about terrorizing the population. The article points out that one can call and anonymously report supposed undocumented immigrants or gang members, which is being used for “pranking” and “swatting.”
The comparison to past historical events is stark, such as the SS rounding up people for having a “Jewish nose” indicates an egregious and hateful approach. The fact that this could occur in a seemingly normal school environment is almost surreal.
The reactions within the document are understandable – anger, fear, and a sense of injustice. The idea that someone could be targeted for the color of their skin and taken into custody is a blatant violation of rights, no matter how they became a citizen. The reference to the “Nuremberg moment” suggests a need for accountability.
The question of accountability is key. What recourse does this student have? Can they sue for unlawful arrest? The article also points out the possibility of being stopped for ID, based on their skin color, which is a scary thought. If the Supreme Court states that the color of one’s skin is cause for detention, then racism is the law of the land.
This whole situation is a symptom of a larger problem. It’s about an agency that seems to be operating with impunity, with little regard for the rights of the individuals it is meant to serve. The need for oversight, reform, and a re-evaluation of ICE’s mission is more critical than ever.