By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene has publicly urged Speaker Mike Johnson to swear in Representative-elect Adelita Grijalva. Greene criticized Johnson’s decision to keep the House out of session, preventing her from representing her district. Johnson has stated that he cannot swear Grijalva in while the House is out of session, despite Grijalva’s desire to participate in a petition. Grijalva has also expressed concern over the delayed swearing-in, describing it as “undemocratic” and detrimental to her constituents.
Read the original article here
Greene: Johnson should swear in Grijalva. That’s the core of it, isn’t it? It seems a bit strange, this whole thing about a representative not being sworn in. Apparently, there’s some kind of alternative procedure, involving a federal judge. And the question then becomes, why isn’t the Speaker, Johnson, doing his job? The arguments seem to circle around the idea that this is more than just a procedural issue. There’s a deeper reason, a motivation, that’s preventing Johnson from taking this simple action.
Greene: Johnson should swear in Grijalva. Now, here’s where things get interesting. The implication is that Johnson is being obstructionist. Why? Well, there’s this suggestion that maybe, just maybe, Greene has seen something. Maybe she’s privy to information that explains Johnson’s reluctance. The whispers of the Epstein files, the idea that certain individuals are being protected, those are heavy accusations. And suddenly, Greene’s stance, even if opportunistic, makes sense. She’s pushing for transparency, for accountability, because she’s seen something she doesn’t like.
Greene: Johnson should swear in Grijalva. It’s almost ironic, isn’t it? That someone like Greene, known for…let’s say colorful views, is the one sounding the alarm. It’s a testament to the strange times we live in when one of the seemingly least rational voices has now become the voice of reason, or at least, a voice that’s making some sense. There’s this undeniable sentiment that something is amiss, that there’s a cover-up going on, and Greene seems to be exploiting the cracks in the facade.
Greene: Johnson should swear in Grijalva. The whole idea of weaponizing the swearing-in process is a point. It used to be a formality, a nice thing to do. Now, it seems like it’s a tool being used to control, to hinder, to obstruct. And there’s this feeling that it shouldn’t even be necessary. Once elected, a representative should hold the position, end of story. The fact that the process is being manipulated, in this case, is a major issue.
Greene: Johnson should swear in Grijalva. Now, let’s talk about Greene herself. It’s impossible to ignore the speculation about her motivations. Is this a genuine shift in perspective? Is she seeing the light, changing her views? Or is this just a calculated move, a power play? The cynic in all of us has to question if she’s simply trying to stay afloat. If she’s seeing where the wind is blowing. She could be positioning herself for a post-Trump world, preparing for the inevitable shifting of the political landscape.
Greene: Johnson should swear in Grijalva. The argument seems to suggest that maybe, she’s trying to get ahead of a MAGA collapse. Perhaps she’s calculating, recognizing the eventual fate of this political movement. She’s calculating the odds, seeking to rewrite her narrative and secure her place in a future where Trump is no longer a factor. So it’s not about principle, not about a genuine shift. It’s about survival, about ensuring a future.
Greene: Johnson should swear in Grijalva. There are some who think that Greene wants a seat in the Senate. That she has softened her edges. That is the only way for her to get to the next level. So, this “sane” tour of hers may be a strategy to change perceptions. That she is trying to soften her edges in order to get a better seat.
Greene: Johnson should swear in Grijalva. One thing’s certain: Greene is playing a game, and she’s playing it well. She seems to understand the nuances of political maneuvering, the art of controlling the narrative. And whether her motives are pure or not, the fact remains: she’s putting pressure on Johnson. She’s forcing him to answer questions. She’s making him justify his actions.
Greene: Johnson should swear in Grijalva. It’s clear that Greene is no paragon of virtue. She is a very savvy player. But right now, what she’s doing seems to be beneficial. She is creating pressure. She’s making an unpopular politician come to terms with the facts. Ultimately, it all boils down to political maneuvering. It’s about power, and it’s about survival.