By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Germany has developed a classified 1,200-page wartime logistics plan, “Operation Plan Germany” or OPLAN DEU, detailing how NATO would transport up to 800,000 troops across German territory in the event of a Russian attack. This plan highlights key infrastructure, including ports, railways, and highways, that would serve as the alliance’s main arteries to the eastern front, reflecting a shift back to a Cold War-style posture. The plan also considers the potential for Russian sabotage and cyberattacks targeting critical infrastructure, underscoring the urgency of the situation, especially given warnings that Russia may be willing to strike within two to five years. The strategy aims to deter conflict by demonstrating to adversaries that any attack would be unsuccessful.
Read the original article here
Germany Drafts Secret 1,200-Page War Plan to Rush 800,000 NATO Troops East. This, it seems, isn’t really a secret at all, nor is it particularly surprising. It’s essentially the entire operational playbook for NATO in Europe, a standard procedure meticulously planned since the 1950s. Every NATO country, as one might expect, has similar plans in place.
The idea of Germany acting as a critical transit point for troops heading east is hardly new. The existing infrastructure of Western and Central Europe is fundamentally designed to facilitate the rapid movement of soldiers and equipment from western ports, right through Germany, towards Poland and other eastern fronts. The extensive Autobahn and A-road systems are specifically engineered for this very purpose, and have been for a long time.
And this isn’t just about roads; it’s about learning from current events. The Ukrainian conflict has highlighted the importance of resilient transport networks. While rail is important, a well-developed road network provides crucial flexibility, allowing for constant supply lines, efficient fuel deliveries, and the smooth movement of both soldiers and civilians.
The need for these plans is clear. Unfortunately, trusting Russia with the current political landscape is simply not feasible. There will always be some trying to create division, but the reality is that the European Union needs to be prepared for all potential scenarios. It’s crucial for the EU to take its own defense seriously, as relying solely on external protection might not always be enough.
The very fact that such plans exist is not the secret, of course. It is the details, the specific “how” and “what” and “where” that are considered sensitive. This is, after all, a standard operational procedure for pretty much every military in the world. The Russians, of course, have their own version, and the Americans have plans, or CONPLANs, for all sorts of contingencies all over the world.
The whole thing feels like a replay of historical strategies, as some have noted. It does bring up the question of whether this is the best current approach. Modern warfare is changing. It could be argued that large formations of troops and armor are obsolete. Prepositioned troops and equipment could easily become inviting targets for modern missiles and drones.
Yet, this plan is not exactly brand new, and the question is whether it needs updating. If these plans are to become operational, then the sheer numbers of troops are a huge consideration. If the US doesn’t participate, then the idea of 800,000 troops being available is questionable, given current geopolitical realities.
However, the infrastructural elements are certainly worth exploring. The A2 highway is a primary example, as it acts as a critical artery for the transport of massive amounts of troops and equipment from the North Sea ports toward the east. Considering that particular highway’s potential bottlenecks, like the bridge over the Elbe River, should become a priority for evaluation and protection.