By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Addressing the anniversary of Kristallnacht, President Steinmeier hinted at the potential banning of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), a party experiencing a surge in popularity. He urged mainstream political parties to collaborate to protect democracy, specifically discouraging any cooperation with extremist groups. Steinmeier’s remarks emphasized the historical precedent of extremist parties gaining power through the support or inaction of others, drawing parallels to the downfall of the Weimar Republic and the rise of Nazism. This statement comes amidst a divide among AfD’s opponents, with some advocating for a ban while others see it as a counterproductive measure.
Read the original article here
President Steinmeier’s speech, given on the anniversary of Kristallnacht, has sparked quite a discussion. He didn’t explicitly name the AfD, but the implication was clear: the possibility of banning the hard-right party is a very real one. Now, it’s crucial to understand that the German President isn’t some all-powerful figurehead who can unilaterally ban a political party. He’s more like a symbolic representative, not the one making the decisions. His role in this instance was to remind everyone that this option is, in fact, on the table. Nothing more, nothing less.
The process for potentially banning a party in Germany is rather involved. It’s not something the government or parliament can simply decide. They have to file a formal request with the German constitutional court. This request essentially asks the court to investigate whether a particular party intends to dismantle the constitutional order and, crucially, if there’s a real risk they might try to do so. If the court agrees, based on §21 of the constitution, the party and any successor organizations are banned.
Historically, this has happened a few times. Most notably, a successor organization to the NSDAP, the Nazi party, and the Communist Party of Germany were both banned. In more recent times, there were two attempts to ban the NPD, a neo-Nazi party. However, the court rejected these requests, once due to the involvement of intelligence agents in the party leadership, and another because the party wasn’t deemed a significant enough threat. The current question centers on whether a similar request against the AfD would have any chance of success. Some believe it’s a necessary step, while others worry that a rejection by the court would be a major victory for the AfD, which is a considerable and understandable concern.
The AfD is already a significant force, holding the second-largest number of seats in the Bundestag. They’re also leading in some opinion polls and are projected to do very well in upcoming regional votes. Steinmeier, in his speech, called on other parties to work together for democracy and to avoid any cooperation with extremist groups. He emphasized that parties threatening the constitution should be aware of the potential for being banned.
There’s a lot to consider regarding the AfD. They were founded only a decade ago and are becoming more extreme. The question then becomes what happens to the voters who support them if they are banned. Voters who support a party that is banned may gravitate to another group with similar views or concerns. There’s also the question of whether a ban would be successful. It is important to note that successor parties are also prohibited and can get banned by law. So, even if the AfD were banned and the leadership created a new party, that party could also be banned.
This all touches on the core issue of how a democracy should deal with extremist viewpoints. One of the central arguments, from Karl Popper, is that while we should generally be tolerant, we should not tolerate those who are intolerant, especially if they incite violence or threaten the democratic process. In the context of a ban, it’s not a decision made lightly. It is a decision that could set a precedent and should be reserved only for parties that actively work to abolish democracy. This is why the process for banning a political party in Germany is so legally complex. Banning is not a simple affair, but rather a decision based on the specific actions and intent of the party in question.