By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Shein opened its first physical store in Paris on November 5, 2025, drawing hundreds of shoppers despite controversy surrounding its fast fashion business model and environmental impact. Simultaneously, the French government announced it was suspending Shein’s online platform due to the sale of childlike sex dolls. This action followed protests and a judicial investigation against Shein and other online retailers. Shein responded by pledging to cooperate with authorities, banning the sex dolls, and suspending third-party seller products, amidst news of a man’s arrest in relation to a similar purchase from China.
Read the original article here
France moves to suspend Shein website, and frankly, it’s about time. It seems the French government, on November 5th, made it clear: comply with French law or face the consequences. This isn’t some minor issue; it’s about the online sale of things that, let’s just say, shouldn’t be on the market. Specifically, the “childlike sex dolls” have stirred up a real hornets’ nest. The backlash is strong, and rightfully so.
The whole thing has sparked a political firestorm. The Paris prosecutor’s office isn’t just taking notice; they’ve launched investigations targeting Shein, along with other online retailers like AliExpress, Temu, and Wish. It’s clear that this goes beyond mere fashion. Now, Shein has declared it’s banning these items. But that’s after the fact. It seems the damage is done.
From what I gather, it’s not just the French who are concerned. I’ve heard from folks in the UK working in the postal service, who’ve seen their workloads balloon thanks to the influx of Shein and Temu orders. This increase in volume isn’t just about fashion; it’s a mountain of “tat” as one person put it. The sentiment is echoed in various corners of the internet: the desire for suspension seems to be widespread.
It’s understandable why people are shocked at the timeline of events. It feels like the red flags were waving from a mile away. The point is being made that if people weren’t buying, there wouldn’t be a need to suspend. The general consensus is, “Let’s expand this to the rest of Europe, and while we’re at it, let’s include Temu.” There’s a general sense of agreement that fast fashion has its place, but this is a step too far.
The core of the problem is pretty clear: online platforms have a responsibility. French authorities have the legal power to make them remove illegal content, like child pornography, within 24 hours. Fail to comply, and they can order internet providers to block access. It’s not about being anti-Shein; it’s about upholding the law.
And the issue with these “childlike sex dolls?” Well, the French seem to be taking a stand. No actual victims or not, according to French law, it’s an issue. It’s a debate that always comes up, but the line has been drawn. It’s illegal because it’s seen as simulating a victim, even if there isn’t one.
Beyond the specific items that triggered the ban, there’s a wider concern about what Shein has become. It started, supposedly, as just a fashion store. But now, it appears to be a marketplace, very similar to Temu, offering a vast array of products. They are also expanding into physical stores. This move, especially given the new regulations around cutting down fashion waste and supply chain tracking, is a bold move. They’re popping up in places like French fashion malls.
There are even accounts of physical stores in places like Canada and Belgium. This expansion strategy brings up interesting questions. Will it impact prices, with added costs like rent and employees?
The legal precedent is also clear: follow the rules or don’t operate in the French market. There’s an emphasis on how France’s courts don’t take kindly to non-compliance. It’s about taking a stand against content that, at the very least, raises serious ethical concerns.
And this all relates to the potential for vast amounts of waste generated by these fast-fashion companies. The problem is they are making it way cheaper and disregarding rules, and regulations. It’s a complex issue, with many angles to consider.
In the end, France is making a statement: some things are simply not acceptable, and those who choose to operate within their borders must abide by the law. This suspension is a clear message.