By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the indictment, Smirnov revealed contact with high-ranking Russian officials, raising flight risk concerns. Despite a prior rejection, the DOJ’s initial attempt to release Smirnov pending appeal has sparked speculation about a potential pardon. Legal experts suggest this unusual move by the DOJ could indicate the Trump administration’s consideration of clemency. This is especially concerning given Smirnov’s alleged improper connections.
Read the original article here
FBI Informant Who Lied About the Bidens Covertly Released From Jail
It’s truly a disquieting situation when you consider the whole scenario involving the FBI informant, Smirnov, who fabricated claims about the Bidens and has now apparently vanished from prison. It’s the kind of thing that makes you question the very foundations of justice, especially when you think about those who have served and believed in the system. The fact that a process server couldn’t locate him at FCI Terminal Island is the first red flag, isn’t it? Then, to learn that the facility’s official response was simply that he’d been “furloughed” without a forwarding address… it all feels deeply unsettling.
The revelation that Smirnov admitted to Russian intelligence involvement in crafting the Hunter Biden narrative really throws gasoline on the fire. It transforms this from a mere instance of misrepresentation into something far more significant, implicating foreign influence and, potentially, manipulation of the American political landscape. The whispers of potential pardons or leniency from certain political factions further muddy the waters. The very suggestion that this individual, central to a supposed Russian disinformation operation, might be released or receive special treatment is beyond the pale.
The possibility of a quiet release, a silent vanishing act, is almost a textbook example of “open corruption”. It’s the kind of move that seems audacious, almost brazen in its disregard for public trust and the rule of law. And, to be clear, by “open corruption”, I mean when it’s so blatant that everyone can see it happening, even while officials maintain that the system is operating fairly. If the DOJ is trying to reverse his conviction, why would they release him? To let the guy out and not tell anyone sounds fishy. If the BOP is nominally supervised by the DOJ Inspector General, then why can’t the public have access to information about this case?
One can’t help but wonder if the refusal to provide details on Smirnov’s whereabouts is some kind of convoluted attempt to protect him, whether from assassination, kidnapping, or simply further scrutiny. But, honestly, when you’re dealing with someone who was involved in spreading such blatant falsehoods, and has a possible relationship with a foreign government, it strains credulity. It definitely seems that the possibility that the Bureau of Prisons just plain let him out is not to be ignored.
The entire situation seems riddled with double-dealing and potential conflicts of interest. The timing is also crucial – this all comes at a time when there are already significant questions about the handling of politically sensitive investigations. And when you look at how the former DOJ employee, who was the Inspector General’s predecessor, investigated wiretaps used in the investigation of, well, you can guess, it just adds to the sense that something is rotten in the state of Denmark.
The concern that Smirnov has already fled the country, perhaps back to Russia or elsewhere, is entirely valid. The implications are enormous. He was central to a narrative that has had a significant impact on public perception and political discourse. If he’s already out of the country, it suggests that the system isn’t functioning as it should.
This whole episode seems to be an example of corruption flaunting itself. Smirnov’s alleged release may be perceived as a display of power, a demonstration that certain individuals or groups are beyond accountability. It’s a deeply cynical message to send, and it does little to inspire faith in the fairness of the legal system. It makes you almost feel like the system is saying, “Look at me, I’m spitting in your face, and there’s nothing you can do about it.”
When we talk about his release we should also talk about the fact that the DOJ filed a joint motion alongside Smirnov’s attorneys to release him pending appeal, despite a U.S. District Judge tossing that effort. This may be an early sign that the Trump administration is considering pardoning Smirnov. What does this mean? It appears that the gears of the system may be aligned to allow him to escape accountability for his lies.