By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A recent missile launch from the Yasny test site in Russia resulted in a failure shortly after takeoff, producing a large plume of purple smoke. While regional authorities have not disclosed the type of missile, reports suggest the launch may have been an RS-28 Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile, based on the site’s configuration and fuel characteristics. However, some outlets propose the incident may involve a UR-100N intercontinental ballistic missile equipped with the Avangard hypersonic glide vehicle, as the site supports both systems. This potential failure marks another setback for Russia’s missile program, which has faced previous challenges, including damage to launch infrastructure.
Read the original article here
Purple Plume Over Russian Test Site After Suspected Sarmat ICBM Launch Failure is the topic at hand, and what a fascinating one it is, filled with a mix of technical speculation and geopolitical implications. We’re talking about a reported launch failure of the Sarmat ICBM, a missile Russia touts as its next-generation strategic weapon, and the associated drama. The defining visual from these incidents, beyond the obvious explosion, is often a distinct purple plume. This color, it turns out, might be a telltale sign. It’s related to the type of fuel used, specifically unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine, or UDMH, as it’s better known, according to experts.
This Sarmat failure brings to mind the unfortunate Proton M rocket failure from July 2013. The similarities are striking: in that instance, the rocket’s yaw control, which controls side-to-side movement, was compromised due to the incorrect installation of angular velocity sensors. A simple, but critical, error. And it seems the Sarmat might have fallen victim to a similar pitfall, where a basic problem can quickly cascade into complete mission failure. The implication is clear – a fundamental error in engineering or quality control can bring down some serious hardware.
It’s worth noting that this is not a one-off event. Reports suggest this is the seventh failure of this particular missile type, raising questions about the reliability of Russia’s cutting-edge military technology. It definitely makes you wonder if these tests are more about demonstrating capability or just confirming everything is still a bit… shaky. The fact that the initial liquid fuel propulsion system was designed by Ukrainian scientists who stopped assisting Russian engineers after the 2014 invasion of Crimea is a key component to understanding the failure of the program.
The situation also highlights the potential for corruption and corners being cut within the Russian military-industrial complex. With the only good thing about Putin’s regime being that it’s absolutely corrupt, it is a big question mark if anything will work or not. No one can be sure. In this environment, it’s easy to see how simple errors can be compounded. The video footage available shows the missile veering off course immediately after launch, then crashing back to earth.
Considering this failure as a whole, it really does paint a picture of ongoing problems with engineering and quality control. This is the new ICBM, the rocket to replace Satan. Yet, it continues to fail miserably every time it’s tested. The US performs regular ICBM tests too, but what if the failure rate for their arsenal is high. This situation underscores the importance of rigorous testing and quality control in complex engineering projects.
The current situation also brings to light strategic ambiguity. No one can be sure if their shit will work in the event of a nuclear war. We just kind of assume it will work and they get to pocket the funding. This seems to be the Russian way, with consistently good launching test botches. But maybe this is just their way of practicing strategic ambiguity: making sure no one can be completely certain of their capabilities.
The implications are serious, especially given the current geopolitical climate. We can worry about nuclear war and the potential for these failures to affect the balance of power. This recent launch failure, as much as it reveals technical issues, also serves to reduce the air of invincibility.