By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The European Parliament is considering a proposal to ban children under 16 from social media platforms. Citing concerning data on young people’s internet usage and potential risks, the Parliament’s Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO) has drafted a resolution advocating for a harmonized digital age limit across the EU. This resolution, which will be voted on in a plenary session, also suggests applying the same age limit to video-sharing platforms and AI assistants, with the possibility of a harmonized digital age limit of 13 years. While the European Commission has been working on measures to protect minors online, it has previously resisted imposing an EU-wide digital age, leaving the decision to member states.
Read the original article here
The European Parliament is seriously considering a ban on social networks for anyone under the age of sixteen. This idea has sparked a pretty intense debate, and it’s easy to see why. There are strong feelings on both sides, with valid points being raised about potential harms and the practicality of enforcing such a ban.
One of the biggest concerns voiced revolves around how this ban would actually be implemented. The idea of enforcing it without resorting to some pretty invasive measures is proving difficult. Many people are worried that any system used to verify age would inevitably require extensive ID collection and surveillance, potentially leading to security breaches and privacy violations. There’s a real fear that this could open the door to all sorts of data being collected and potentially misused, something many find deeply concerning. The possibility of workarounds also adds to this challenge. Kids are pretty resourceful, and it’s quite likely they would find ways to bypass any age verification system, perhaps by using fake information or going to less regulated platforms, which might expose them to even greater risks.
However, many people agree that something needs to be done. There’s a very real recognition that the current state of social media has significant negative effects, especially on young minds. Some believe that the addictive algorithms used by these platforms are a major problem, as they can amplify engaging content. These algorithms are viewed as a key driver of addiction, misinformation, and social division. Regulating these algorithms seems like a solution to some, since they’re seen as tools that keep users hooked and that could be exploited by malicious actors.
There are also those who see the issue of social media through a broader lens. They suggest that perhaps the focus shouldn’t be solely on age, but rather on the platforms’ impact on societal well-being. Some propose more radical solutions, like banning addictive algorithms or even eliminating personalized feeds entirely. There’s a sentiment that we may need a fundamental shift in how we approach technology use, including the possibility of a return to simpler forms of digital interaction.
The challenge of age verification, however, is a persistent one. Some argue that age verification could be achieved through digital wallets, with each European Union citizen already having an ID card. Digital wallets could let individuals control their digital identity, share information selectively and verify without revealing sensitive data. The EU is also experimenting with “Zero Knowledge Proofs,” which could allow users to prove they are over a certain age without revealing their date of birth. This tech offers a potential pathway to enforcement that prioritizes privacy. The goal of those developing digital wallets in the EU is to give people back control over their data, and it is considered as an important opportunity for Europe to become the leading continent for privacy-friendly tech, building on the foundations of GDPR.
Ultimately, the debate is complex, with no easy answers. It’s a balancing act between protecting young people from potential harms and safeguarding fundamental rights like privacy and freedom of expression. There’s a recognition that simply banning things, particularly when it comes to technology, is often ineffective. It may also inadvertently push young people toward less safe environments.
The conversation is not just about the idea of a ban itself, but the broader implications for the future of the internet and how we, as a society, choose to interact with it. Whatever the final decision, it’s clear that the European Parliament’s deliberations will have a profound impact on the digital lives of millions.